“…If at diagnosis, sFLC ratio is a predictor of more aggressive disease (Kyrtsonis et al, 2007;Van Rhee et al, 2007), regarding correlations of this value with response values, the consensus was not unanimous, as normal sFLC did not necessarily correlate with MRDnegativity (Giarin et al, 2009;Kapoor et al, 2013;Mead & Drayson, 2009;Singhal et al, 2009;Martinez-Lopez et al, 2015). Similar results emerged, in 2013 and 2014, from studies by Smeltzer et al (2013), andCornell et al (2014), using involved FLC at 1 year after ASCT in samples of 697 and 50 patients respectively. In 2007, an American group reported the results of a tight monitoring of sFLC levels, carrying out surveys at onset, no later than 7 days at the beginning of the first induction cycle, before the second one, and then before the first ASCT, demonstrating that higher tumour In 2011, a Spanish group, demonstrating high rate of discrepancy in terms of PFS and TTP, simultaneously compared results of immunofixation, sFLC, and MFC of 102 patients who achieved partial response with ≥70% reduction in M-component, out of a total of 260 (Paiva, Martinez-Lopez, et al, 2011;Paiva, Perez-Andres, et al, 2011).…”