2019
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustained Release T3 Therapy: Animal Models and Translational Applications

Abstract: The standard of care to treat hypothyroidism is daily administration of levo-thyroxine (LT4). This is based on the understanding that deiodinases can restore production of T3 and compensate for the small amounts of T3 that are normally produced by the thyroid gland. However, pre-clinical and clinical evidence indicating that deiodinases fall short of restoring T3 production is accumulating, opening the possibility that liothyronine (LT3) might have a role in the treatment of some hypothyroid patients. LT3 tabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 14 combination therapy trials that have been completed, 10 employed once-daily LT3 administration [23, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 59, 71, 78, 79], 4 employed twice-daily LT3 therapy [17, 48, 53, 60], and none used three times a day LT3 therapy. Assuming that three times daily LT3 administration is too onerous to be used in future trials [75, 76], and considering that a sustained-release preparation is not yet available for clinical use [80-83], twice a day therapy may be the most reasonable option. Given that twice-daily LT3 therapy, although not ideal with respect to the T3 fluctuations produced, is likely to be the best compromise, modeling studies provide information about potential twice-daily LT3 doses that could be utilized [67, 77].…”
Section: Results: Topics Summaries Summary Statements and Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 14 combination therapy trials that have been completed, 10 employed once-daily LT3 administration [23, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 59, 71, 78, 79], 4 employed twice-daily LT3 therapy [17, 48, 53, 60], and none used three times a day LT3 therapy. Assuming that three times daily LT3 administration is too onerous to be used in future trials [75, 76], and considering that a sustained-release preparation is not yet available for clinical use [80-83], twice a day therapy may be the most reasonable option. Given that twice-daily LT3 therapy, although not ideal with respect to the T3 fluctuations produced, is likely to be the best compromise, modeling studies provide information about potential twice-daily LT3 doses that could be utilized [67, 77].…”
Section: Results: Topics Summaries Summary Statements and Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There should not be a clinically meaningful difference in TSH between groups to be able to make a meaningful comparison of the outcomes between the two therapies. As long as a new sustained-release T3 product is not being utilized [80][81][82][83], the outcome measures do not need to be selected with Food and Drug Administration approval in mind. The most important consideration for choice of outcome measure is whether this outcome is responsive to LT3 therapy within the range of acceptable T3 levels or T3 tissue actions.…”
Section: Outcomes To Be Considered In Future Combination Therapy Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 14 combination therapy trials that have been completed, 10 employed once-daily LT3 administration (23,46,47,49,51,52,59,71,78,79), 4 employed twice-daily LT3 therapy (17,48,53,60), and none used three times a day LT3 therapy. Assuming that three times daily LT3 administration is too onerous to be used in future trials (75,76), and considering that a sustained-release preparation is not yet available for clinical use (80)(81)(82)(83), twice a day therapy may be the most reasonable option. Given that twice-daily LT3 therapy, although not ideal with respect to the T3 fluctuations produced, is likely to be the best compromise, modeling studies provide information about potential twice-daily LT3 doses that could be utilized (67,77).…”
Section: Summary Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There should not be a clinically meaningful difference in TSH between groups to be able to make a meaningful comparison of the outcomes between the two therapies. As long as a new sustained-release T3 product is not being utilized (80)(81)(82)(83), the outcome measures do not need to be selected with Food and Drug Administration approval in mind. The most important consideration for choice of outcome measure is whether this outcome is responsive to LT3 therapy within the range of acceptable T3 levels or T3 tissue actions.…”
Section: Summary Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This knowledge gap highlights the need for more sophisticated and well-designed RCTs, large studies that allow for subgroup analysis to identify which patients benefit with DTE compared to LT4, and studies incorporating patient-reported and patient-important outcomes, to elucidate the physiological support responsible for combined therapy preference in this subset of patients. On the other hand, research efforts could be directed to evaluate the effect of synthetic slow-release preparations of thyroid hormones [37] in humans and the development of dose-consistent DTE preparations.…”
Section: Implications For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%