Sustained knowledge work and thinking time amongst academics: gender and working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a migration of workforces to work from home. A key issue for academics was the implications for the ability to carve out 'thinking time' to engage in what we term sustained knowledge work, the type of work essential for producing research. We administered an employee survey to academics from seven Australian and seven Canadian Universities, receiving over 3000 responses. We report on both quantitative and qualitative findings from the survey, with a particular emphasis on the latter. The two countries displayed broadly similar patterns in responses, but these patterns were gendered in specific ways. We distinguished between episodic and sustained knowledge work and found the shift of the location for sustained knowledge work from the workplace to the home affected academics unevenly, with disproportionate negative impacts on women. There are implications for all knowledge workers: while gendered, domestic norms continue to exist, the sustained knowledge work that is critical to career advancement can become especially problematic for women knowledge workers.

The Economic Impacts of the COVID‐19 Pandemic in Australia: A Closer Look at Gender Gaps in Employment, Earnings and Education

“…Numerous studies into the impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the Australian workforce have highlighted the differing impacts of the pandemic on men's and women's labour market outcomes and opportunities, both in macroeconomic terms and in various industry‐specific analyses (for example, Borland and Charlton 2020; van Barneveld et al 2020; Birch and Preston 2021; Botha et al 2021; Churchill 2021; Foley and Cooper 2021; Foley and Williamson 2021; Lim et al 2021; Peetz et al 2022). A persistent finding among these studies is that the pandemic had the effect of amplifying pre‐existing gender dynamics and social and economic inequities more broadly.…”

The impact of the pandemic on early career researchers' work‐life and scholarly communications: A quantitative aerial analysis

“…Given the changes to the workplace that had already been chronicled in the literature (Herman et al, 2021;Nicholas et al, 2022aNicholas et al, , 2022bPeetz et al, 2022) and the huge potential impact it seemed to be having, there were quite a number of questions on the topic.…”

Women, work and industrial relations in Australia in 2021

“…While men spent more time on unpaid childcare during the pandemic than previously, women retained a disproportionate responsibility for the more mundane and burdensome caring and household duties (Craig and Churchill, 2021). This frustrated women's connection to the workforce during the pandemic, it took a toll on their mental health and well-being (Risse and Jackson, 2021; Ruppanner et al, 2021), and reduced their capacity to engage in sustained knowledge work and thinking time while working from home (Peetz et al, 2022). The likely continuation of remote working post-pandemic spurred further debate in 2021, highlighting the opportunities and risks for women and work into the future (eg Gross and Mostyn, 2021).…”