2014
DOI: 10.1128/aac.02542-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustained Delivery of Commensal Bacteria from Pod-Intravaginal Rings

Abstract: Topical administration of live commensal bacteria to the vaginal tract holds significant potential as a cost-effective strategy for the treatment of sexually transmitted infections and the delivery of mucosal vaccines. Probiotic-releasing intravaginal rings (IVRs) embody significant theoretical advantages over traditional daily-dosage forms, such as sustained and controlled delivery leading to improved adherence to therapy compared to that of frequent dosing. The conventional IVR designs, however, are not amen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the leuprolide-releasing ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) ring described by Kimball et al comprises ten distinct manufacturing steps: (i) washing of EVA beads to remove monomeric vinyl acetate; (ii) vacuum drying of beads; (iii) cryogenic milling of EVA granules to powder; (iv) preparation of ethanolic solution of EVA and leuprolide; (v) solvent casting of the ethanolic mixture; (vi) solvent evaporation; (vii) milling of the EVA/drug mixtures to form a powder; (viii) extrusion of the leuprolide acetate/EVA granulation mixture; (ix) pelletization of the mixtures; and finally (x) manufacture of the rings by injection molding [ 25 ]. The widely reported pod-insert vaginal rings [ 17 , 19 , 21 , 23 , 30 , [34] , [35] , [36] ] – comprising multiple individual polymer-coated drug cores embedded in a ring body, each core connected to the external environment through a preformed delivery channel – are similarly complex and time-consuming to manufacture, involving at least nine distinct steps: (i) compaction of drug powder to form a core; (ii) drop-coating of cores using a polylactic acid solution; (iii) fabrication of silicone elastomer ring bodies via injection molding; (iv) creation of delivery channels by mechanical punching; (v) trimming of sprue material and flashing; (vi) cleaning of silicone with ethanol to remove debris from the molding process; (vii) manual placement of a drug-loaded pod into each cavity; (viii) backfilling of the pod cavity with non-medicated silicone elastomer; (ix) filling of any unused pod cavities [ 17 ]. There is, therefore, a need for new vaginal ring designs for sustained/controlled release of hydrophilic or macromolecular drugs that can be easily manufactured using more conventional and scalable processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the leuprolide-releasing ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) ring described by Kimball et al comprises ten distinct manufacturing steps: (i) washing of EVA beads to remove monomeric vinyl acetate; (ii) vacuum drying of beads; (iii) cryogenic milling of EVA granules to powder; (iv) preparation of ethanolic solution of EVA and leuprolide; (v) solvent casting of the ethanolic mixture; (vi) solvent evaporation; (vii) milling of the EVA/drug mixtures to form a powder; (viii) extrusion of the leuprolide acetate/EVA granulation mixture; (ix) pelletization of the mixtures; and finally (x) manufacture of the rings by injection molding [ 25 ]. The widely reported pod-insert vaginal rings [ 17 , 19 , 21 , 23 , 30 , [34] , [35] , [36] ] – comprising multiple individual polymer-coated drug cores embedded in a ring body, each core connected to the external environment through a preformed delivery channel – are similarly complex and time-consuming to manufacture, involving at least nine distinct steps: (i) compaction of drug powder to form a core; (ii) drop-coating of cores using a polylactic acid solution; (iii) fabrication of silicone elastomer ring bodies via injection molding; (iv) creation of delivery channels by mechanical punching; (v) trimming of sprue material and flashing; (vi) cleaning of silicone with ethanol to remove debris from the molding process; (vii) manual placement of a drug-loaded pod into each cavity; (viii) backfilling of the pod cavity with non-medicated silicone elastomer; (ix) filling of any unused pod cavities [ 17 ]. There is, therefore, a need for new vaginal ring designs for sustained/controlled release of hydrophilic or macromolecular drugs that can be easily manufactured using more conventional and scalable processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this new dosage form ultimately improved the comfort and ease of use, as the controlled muco-adhesive vaginal formulation affords a prolonged residence time of the LBM at efficacious concentrations with less frequent administration. Slow release delivery strategies have been successfully developed for antifungal and antibacterial drugs and for other vaginal LBPs using different muco-adhesive tablets or vaginal rings [ 33 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pod-IVR has been applied to delivery of small molecule ARV drugs for HIV [18, 19, 2325] and HSV [18, 26] prevention as well as to vaginal delivery of monoclonal antibodies [27] and bacterial probiotics [28]. The pod-IVR consists of a silicone elastomer scaffold containing individual embedded drug pods that act as independent delivery devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%