Tradeoffs or Synergies? Agricultural Intensification, Economic Development and the Environment 2000
DOI: 10.1079/9780851994352.0365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable versus unsustainable agricultural intensification in Africa: focus on policy reforms and market conditions.

Abstract: The chapter discusses the concept of sustainable agricultural intensification (SAI) applied to Africa. A simple conceptual framework to link policies and farm intensification choices is laid out. There is a discussion in general terms on how macroeconomic and sectoral policies have affected farmer incentives for sustainable intensification. Selected case studies are presented of African farmers following a variety of sustainable and unsustainable intensification paths.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an important thread of the literature questions whether ISFM/INRM practices that require minimal purchased external inputs are truly more accessible to poorer smallholders (Reardon and Vosti, 1997;Reardon et al, 2001;Barrett et al, 2002;Moser and Barrett, 2003). We explore this question not only by studying adoption patterns but also by looking at patterns of disadoption or abandonment of these four ISFM/INRM practices so as to establish whether household endowments affect both uptake and continuation of these practices.…”
Section: Data and Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, an important thread of the literature questions whether ISFM/INRM practices that require minimal purchased external inputs are truly more accessible to poorer smallholders (Reardon and Vosti, 1997;Reardon et al, 2001;Barrett et al, 2002;Moser and Barrett, 2003). We explore this question not only by studying adoption patterns but also by looking at patterns of disadoption or abandonment of these four ISFM/INRM practices so as to establish whether household endowments affect both uptake and continuation of these practices.…”
Section: Data and Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Smallholder agriculture in much of the low-income tropics is nonetheless characterized by widespread failure to make sufficient soil fertility replenishment and soil conservation investments in order to sustain the quality of farmland (Sanchez et al, 2001;Reardon et al, 2001;Barrett et al, 2002;World Bank, 2003). A substantial literature based on cross-sectional analysis has explored the adoption of INRM and ISFM methods in order to understand the failure to make these critical investments (Sheikh et al, 2003;Phiri et al, 2003;Franzel et al, 2001;Pfister et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…through infrastructure development, often increase the intensity of agricultural input use and the productivity of agriculture and reduces the risk associated with investments in agricultural production (Lee et al, 2001). In that way, better access to market can reduce the need for land expansion (Reardon et al, 2001). If roads open up formerly inaccessible areas, colonization pressures can result in environmental degradation (Lee et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutions not only govern the processes by which scientific and technical knowledge is created, but also facilitate the promotion of new agricultural technologies for improved agricultural production (Hayami and Ruttan, 1971). Infrastructure, including transportation facilities, and access to market centers also make equally important contributions to land-use change by providing opportunities for locationally suitable and economically attractive land-use systems (Allan, 1986;Turkelboom et al, 1996;Reardon et al, 2001).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Land-use Change: a Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%