2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable removal of arsenic from simulated wastewater using solid waste seed pods biosorbents of Cassia fistula L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biosorption is a technique derived from adsorption. Biosorption has been considered a promising As removal method from groundwater and for other elements [ 17 , 27 , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] ]. In contrast to other conventional procedures, like oxidation, filtration, reverse osmosis, electrokinetics, ion exchange, coagulation, flocculation, or phytoremediation [ 16 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 25 , 36 , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biosorption is a technique derived from adsorption. Biosorption has been considered a promising As removal method from groundwater and for other elements [ 17 , 27 , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] ]. In contrast to other conventional procedures, like oxidation, filtration, reverse osmosis, electrokinetics, ion exchange, coagulation, flocculation, or phytoremediation [ 16 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 25 , 36 , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biosorption has been considered a promising As removal method from groundwater and for other elements [ 17 , 27 , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] ]. In contrast to other conventional procedures, like oxidation, filtration, reverse osmosis, electrokinetics, ion exchange, coagulation, flocculation, or phytoremediation [ 16 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 25 , 36 , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] ]. This method is preferred because it, has the advantages of low cost, high efficiency, negligible sludge production, the chance of recovery of As, and regeneration [ 49 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive reviews on the removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by biochar are already available. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] However, none of the previous reviews has focused on metalloaded biochars and the specific removal mechanisms. Given their significance, the current review centers on the applications of metal-loaded biochars in arsenic removal with special…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive reviews on the removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by biochar are already available [28–34] . However, none of the previous reviews has focused on metal‐loaded biochars and the specific removal mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of biomass has emerged as a promising low-cost solution [ 38 ] for the treatment and management of large volumes of agro-industrial wastes [ 39 , 40 ]. In this sense, biochar comes from a wide range of biomass, such as fruit, legume peels and husks [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ], bagasse/pomace, fruit pit and shells [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], forestry wastes and pruning [ 51 , 52 , 53 ], sludge [ 54 , 55 ] and animal manure [ 56 , 57 ]. The biochar obtention releases more hydrogen than it consumes, making it a negative-emission technology [ 58 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%