2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable recovery of nickel from spent hydrogenation catalyst: economics, emissions and wastes assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the above information, along with a more conservative assumption of $3/lb reclamation cost, our cost calculations for an averaged precious metal based catalyst (average cost of precious metal based catalysts in Table 3 is $166/lb) show that a 65 % cost recovery from precious metal reclamation is easily feasible for a catalyst that costs $166/lb (our assumed base case catalyst cost for reactor #2, see Table 2). The percent cost recovery from low-cost catalysts is dependent on the cost of the metal components, as shown specifically for a Ni-based catalyst [55]; we assume no cost recovery for the $12/lb (averaged unit catalyst cost as shown in Table 2) catalyst in reactor #1. Impacts of uncertainties in this area are quantified later through a sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Catalyst Maintenance and Metal Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above information, along with a more conservative assumption of $3/lb reclamation cost, our cost calculations for an averaged precious metal based catalyst (average cost of precious metal based catalysts in Table 3 is $166/lb) show that a 65 % cost recovery from precious metal reclamation is easily feasible for a catalyst that costs $166/lb (our assumed base case catalyst cost for reactor #2, see Table 2). The percent cost recovery from low-cost catalysts is dependent on the cost of the metal components, as shown specifically for a Ni-based catalyst [55]; we assume no cost recovery for the $12/lb (averaged unit catalyst cost as shown in Table 2) catalyst in reactor #1. Impacts of uncertainties in this area are quantified later through a sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Catalyst Maintenance and Metal Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it has been previously sustained, biotechnological methods may represent a promising alternative for the treatment of spent catalysts (Noori-Felegari, et al, 2014), due to important microbial properties, like their ability to survive and adapt to elevated metal concentrations, and also to transform solid non-essential metals into soluble and extractable elements that could be recovered (Yang, Qi, Low & Song, 2011;Sahu, Agrawal & Mishra, 2013). In this regard, research has also been performed to develop bio-approaches for the mining industry.…”
Section: Microbiological Approaches For the Treatment Of Spent Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kjaerheim (2005) proposes the Norwegian method for Cleaner Production alongside Greening of the Supply chain, as a route towards sustainability, whilst Almeida et al (2010), Ravichandran et al (2011) and Yang et al (2011) provide a variety of tools, techniques and technologies to prevent and minimize waste across various key material streams. Seadon (2010) reports on attempts to systematise waste management knowledge in order to achieve greater sophistication, suggesting what a sustainable waste management system must do, without saying how the system should do it.…”
Section: Theory Of Waste In Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%