Sustainable purchasing and supply management: a structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels

Abstract

International audienceThis paper provides a structured literature review of sustainability in purchasing and supply management, moving beyond the traditional environmental and social sustainability. The paper reviews the concept of sustainability at three levels of inter-organizational analysis - i.e. dyad, supply chain and network. The paper distils the nature and scope of existing research and synthesizes measures used to research sustainability across organizational boundaries. This literature review systematically analyzes existing literature. In particular, the review focuses on definitions and measures of sustainable purchasing and supply management to obtain an accurate view of current research. This paper uncovers two distinct trends in the type of research carried out. First, internal or dyadic issues are in focus and second, a tendency to deal with environmental, as opposed to social, sustainability. Despite the need to look beyond the dyad given the risks associated with the extended network, few studies do so in any of the sustainability dimensions. This review is limited by the method employed focusing on definitions and measures. Although the review considers supply chain and network research, it does so purely from a purchasing perspective, thus excluding issues such as logistics and transport. The paper identifies areas open to future research and provides practical insights into how sustainable purchasing and supply are measured. It also synthesizes existing measures of sustainability at different levels and organizes these into a taxonomy. The paper examines studies across multiple levels of analysis and integrates multiple fields of knowledge to show how research on sustainability in purchasing and supply is structured

Translating stakeholder pressures into environmental performance – the mediating role of green HRM practices

“…Although the HR manager is the natural target respondent for green HRM practices, we also chose to target the supply chain (SC) function because this part of the value chain has long been subject to environmental-related pressures and managers are expected to be knowledgeable about environmental-related stakeholder pressures, as well as the firm environmental performance. The relative maturity of the SCM domain in terms of environmental issues is also revealed by the extent of broad-reaching and compelling research (for a review see for example Golicic and Smith, 2013;Miemczyk, Johnsen, & Macquet, 2012). In the end, our research design allowed to obtain measures of predictor and criterion variables from different sources, which help to control for method bias (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, & Podsakoff, 2012).…”

Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance

“…Several studies investigate the impact of sustainability practices as a whole, combining environmental and social measures, which makes separate analysis impossible (Porteous et al 2015). Furthermore, the majority of papers in sustainable supply chain management ask whether it pay to be green; very few ask whether it pays to be socially responsible (Miemczyk et al 2012).…”

Ethical Sourcing: An Analysis of the Literature and Implications for Future Research

“…Second, sustainability in the upstream has received increasing attention in literature; however, little research has been performed to evaluate its current status. Third, although a few works have been recently carried out, most of them are focused only on either sustainable (Hoejmose and Adrien-Kirby 2012;Miemczyk et al 2012) or environmental issues (Tate et al 2012;Genovese et al 2013;Appolloni et al 2014). Much less is known about its social aspect.…”