Sustainable Project Finance, the Adoption of the Equator Principles and Shareholder Value Effects

Abstract

Recent trends in the project finance industry include an increasing volume and a growing awareness of sustainable development. This has raised the question of whether and a how voluntary code of conduct such as the Equator Principles (EP) could enhance its impact on the project finance industry. We apply an event study methodology, and also consider the market model and conditional variance. We find positive abnormal returns for financial institutions adopting the EP, which supports the reputational risk hypothesis. Furthermore, we document that adopters outperform the global project finance market, especially in terms of market share. However, we do not find evidence that non‐adopters are excluded from lending syndicates. Results include practical recommendations for environmental policy. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

The influence of environmental NGOs on project finance: a case study of activism, development and Australia’s Great Barrier Reef

“…It has, in fact, been difficult to determine the overall impact of the principles one way or another (Eisenbach et al 2014). Difficulties arise in joint finance operations (common in project finance) where there may be a number of banks some of which are Equator Principles Financial Institutions (EPFIs) and others which are not.…”

The Quality of Disclosures on Environmental Policy: The Profile of Financial Intermediaries

“…First, research on environmental disclosure and FIs is still very limited, despite the increasing number of financial firms (banks, especially) that publish sustainability reports (Carnevale et al ., ). Second, the approach to environmental matters by FIs has made considerable progress: today, FIs are more and more involved in the dynamics of environmental issues (Weber, ), either directly as companies themselves or indirectly through lending and investing activities (Weber, ; Eisenbach et al ., ). These considerations make FIs an especially interesting subject of study.…”

Stakeholder Engagement: An Evaluation of European Banks

“…On an unprecedented scale, cases of manipulation of market benchmarks, mis‐selling of financial products to consumers, circumvention of anti‐money laundering and counterterrorist financing regulation, and support of tax evasion have emerged. In addition, the sector has indirect environmental impacts through investing in questionable activities or financing customer who carry out such activities (Eisenbach et al ., ; Sarokin and Schulkin, ; Thompson and Cowton, ; Viganò and Nicolai, ; Weber, , ). However, the financial sector traditionally has been considered to be less involved in CSR because it has a low direct environmental impact, especially in comparison to industrial sectors, such as the chemical, petroleum, and paper industries (Matute‐Vallejo et al ., ; Thompson and Cowton, ).…”