2020
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202003456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable Li‐Ion Batteries: Chemistry and Recycling

Abstract: The ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003456.footprint of LIBs by designing their components that are less toxic and more abundant, the inevitable recycling is still largely in disagreement with circular principles. [1,2] This review summarizes and critically assesses current LIB recycling technologies from a sustainable perspective in order to derive whether current solutions can be referred as green technologies. The structure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
153
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 261 publications
0
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous reviews have been published within the last couple of years, in which various recycling methods under development are critically analyzed. [21,94,95,[98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109] While an indepth review of recycling methods is beyond the scope of the work presented herein, the technologies under development are briefly discussed and the trends in challenges identified and future outlooks proposed within a series of reviews are considered.…”
Section: Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous reviews have been published within the last couple of years, in which various recycling methods under development are critically analyzed. [21,94,95,[98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109] While an indepth review of recycling methods is beyond the scope of the work presented herein, the technologies under development are briefly discussed and the trends in challenges identified and future outlooks proposed within a series of reviews are considered.…”
Section: Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of labeling systems on battery packs makes pre-sorting challenging and introduces additional safety concerns as LIBs can enter Pb-acid battery waste streams accidentally. [101] Of the reviews considered, [21,94,95,[98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109] the technical barriers to widespread adoption of LIB recycling identified were ubiquitous, with each highlighting the need for; 1) sufficient labeling systems for easy identification, 2) standardization of cell material, cell design and processing, and/or greater flexibility in the recycling processes, 3) minimization of components, 4) screening, health monitoring and sorting methods and 5) automation in the disassembly line. It was acknowledged by the majority of reviews that many of these challenges require necessary intervention from policy-makers to provide a clear recycling industry chain and introduce sufficient regulations for the safe transport and handling of waste LIBs.…”
Section: Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last decades have witnessed a massive spurt of rechargeable lithium ion batteries (LIBs) in electrifying our modern lives ranging from portable electronics to electric vehicles [1][2][3][4]. While the global renewable energy campaign to 'Net Zero' further promotes the application of LIBs in the emerging market of energy storage [5,6], the market also has shown persisting requirement on higher energy density and more cost-effectiveness by seeking the alternative rechargeable battery products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This motivated a great revolution in the development of electrodes with high volumetric/gravimetric energy density and long-term cycle life [ 7 , 8 ]. Hence, satisfying the ever-increasing demand for LIBs is urgent and vital for many industries as well as society [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Materials comprising the major components of electrodes are tightly linked to the demand and the market prospects for LIBs [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%