2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68715-5_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable Intensification in Crop Farming – A Case from Estonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SI's initial focus on environmentally friendly manufacturing has been criticized in recent years for failing to comprehend the true nature of food production systems, including social and economic aspects (Cook et al, 2015). To improve the efficiency of SI activities, it is proposed that political, economic, and social indicators and perspectives be included; these aspects are currently being adjusted (Smith et al 2016;Värnik et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SI's initial focus on environmentally friendly manufacturing has been criticized in recent years for failing to comprehend the true nature of food production systems, including social and economic aspects (Cook et al, 2015). To improve the efficiency of SI activities, it is proposed that political, economic, and social indicators and perspectives be included; these aspects are currently being adjusted (Smith et al 2016;Värnik et al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also some exceptions, e.g., the three Baltic countries. Compared with Lithuania and Latvia, Estonia has a higher degree of agricultural intensification [54]. These two neighboring countries are still in the era of peasant economy.…”
Section: Analysis Of National Differencesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since, beef cattle production, coupled with marketing, significantly contributes negatively to the environment, manifested through greenhouse gas emissions, fertilizer usage, land utilization, groundwater depletion, and biodiversity losses [62,63]. The study was focused on efficient marketing practices capable of mitigating this environmental impact in social and economic form [64,65]. Therefore, the regional-based determinants of beef cattle commercialization and marketing constraints need to be systematically evaluated in the context of current beef cattle production decisions, cost-effectiveness, and profit maximization.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%