2021
DOI: 10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00231-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable food profiling models to inform the development of food labels that account for nutrition and the environment: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the provision of clear and transparent information to consumers plays a key role. Indeed, different sustainability measurements have been developed (e.g., Eco-Score) to assess the impact of the food product on the environment, although they still need to be further developed (Bunge et al 2021). There is some initial evidence that measurements like Eco-Score may encourage environmentally friendly food choices (De Bauw et al 2021).…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the provision of clear and transparent information to consumers plays a key role. Indeed, different sustainability measurements have been developed (e.g., Eco-Score) to assess the impact of the food product on the environment, although they still need to be further developed (Bunge et al 2021). There is some initial evidence that measurements like Eco-Score may encourage environmentally friendly food choices (De Bauw et al 2021).…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discuss the consideration that co‐benefits are not universal, with trade‐offs required across the health and environmental measures even when population diets are carefully designed, evidence based and adapted to contextual factors 93 . Bunge et al conducted a systematic review to explore the existing food profiling models as a tool to inform the development of food labels that account for nutrition and environmental sustainability 94 . Published in the Lancet Planetary Health, their review identified 16 sustainable food profiling models from which they describe a number of advantages and disadvantages 75 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• A systematic review comparing consumer preference for nutrition, environmental and social responsibility food labelling (International) 125 • A systematic review of sustainable food profiling models used to inform the development of food labels accounting for both nutrition and the environment (International) 94 • A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the willingness to pay more for foods with environmental sustainability labels (International) 126 • Consideration of the practicalities of labelling to encourage sustainable food choices by consumers and trigger systemic changes (International) [127][128][129][130] • Traffic light labelling of meal choices as a method of persuasion (United Kingdom) 131 Institutional Institutional food service guidelines and auditing…”
Section: Food Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both colour coded labels and warning labels have been associated with healthier consumer choices 23. Labelling foods according to their effect on the environment could have added benefits for planetary health 242526…”
Section: Missed Opportunitymentioning
confidence: 99%