Sustainable development of the Belgrade energy system

Jovanović, Miroslav N.; Afgan, Naim; Radovanović, Predrag; Stevanović, Vladimir D.

doi:10.1016/j.energy.2008.01.013

Cited by 75 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In particular, the local and global emissions have been generally considered as crucial. The correlation with human health in a specific area will have to take into account the actual concentration of those pollutants in the district environment (air) [43] and to propose a risk methodology for the augmented potential risk created.…”

Section: The Ranking Of the Criteria Based On Playing Card Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support Systems for Future Urban Energy Retrofitting Scenarios

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, there is an increasing concern about sustainable urban energy development taking into account national priorities of each city. Many cities have started to define future strategies and plans to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Urban energy scenarios involve the consideration of a wide range of conflicting criteria, both socio-economic and environmental ones. Moreover, decision-makers (DMs) require proper tools that can support their choices in a context of multiple stakeholders and a long-term perspective. In this context, Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support Systems (MC-SDSS) are often used in order to define and analyze urban scenarios since they support the comparison of different solutions, based on a combination of multiple factors. The main problem, in relation to urban energy retrofitting scenarios, is the lack of appropriate knowledge and evaluation criteria. The latter are crucial for delivering and assessing urban energy scenarios through a MC-SDSS tool. The main goal of this paper is to analyze and test two different methods for the definition and ranking of the evaluation criteria. More specifically, the paper presents an on-going research study related to the development of a MC-SDSS tool able to identify and evaluate alternative energy urban scenarios in a long-term period perspective. This study refers to two Smart City and Communities research projects, namely: DIMMER (District Information Modeling and Management for Energy Reduction) and EEB (Zero Energy Buildings in Smart Urban Districts).

show abstract

Section: The Ranking Of the Criteria Based On Playing Card Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Global emissions CO 2 [36,43,44] Measure the equivalent emission of CO 2 , which is avoided by the examined action. Tons/year…”

Section: Environmentalmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support Systems for Future Urban Energy Retrofitting Scenarios

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to (Kemmler & Spreng, 2007), the most important sustainability issues are related to the production and use of energy. Excellent research work with the practical case study on how sustainability indicators can be used for the evaluation of the future development challenges can be found in (Jovanović, Afgan, Radovanović, & Stevanović, 2009). According to (Kemmler & Spreng, 2007), sustainability indicators can be divided into three main areas: economy, environment and society.…”

Section: Sustainability Indicators In Urban Areasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of living and sustainability indictors: City of Ljubljana, vision 2050

Sučić¹,

Pušnik²,

Cesen³

et al. 2014

Industrija

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… Ultraviolet ray resistance: It is prioritized depending on technologies used in systems and the possibility of attaching screening layers (Courret, et al, 1996) 5.2 Utilization 1) Economic Dimension:  Initial cost or investment cost includes all of the costs of constructing and transporting the product (Gašparini, et al, 2014). There is a direct relationship between efficiency and construction cost (Jovanovic, et al, 2009).  Operation cost: It includes all of the fees, government energy incentives and costs of system operating (Pilavachi, et al, 2009).…”

Section: Lighting Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Integration Issues for Using Innovative Daylighting Strategies in Light Wells

Gashniani

Saradj

Faizi

2017

Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:"Light well" as one of the most common means of daylight tolls in building, experiences severe limitations and deserve special attention. The question is which strategy is the best for increasing the daylight penetration to the depth of buildings. One of the main challenges in deep plan is to guide daylight into the building core and this can be performed through daylighting strategies, but the choice of the proper innovative daylighting system (IDS) with several parameters is the problem. This paper aims to find elements for optimal choice and selecting context-compatible tools for light well. The result shows that four macro factors were found at the interaction of building and IDS. Identifying the integration components can play an effective role in decision-making or design a new tolls consistent with the physical conditions of light well and building to overcome the daylight crisis. * Corresponding author. Fatemeh Mehdizadeh SARADJ, mehdizadeh@iust.ac.ir

show abstract

Sustainable development of the Belgrade energy system

Cited by 75 publications

References 1 publication

Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support Systems for Future Urban Energy Retrofitting Scenarios

Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support Systems for Future Urban Energy Retrofitting Scenarios

Quality of living and sustainability indictors: City of Ljubljana, vision 2050

Integration Issues for Using Innovative Daylighting Strategies in Light Wells

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About