Japan's policy-level ODA (Official Development Assistance) evaluation has played a complementary role for project-level evaluation. Japan encountered policy-level challenges, mainly from OECD/DAC, beyond the level of project management. Some of policy recommendations derived from the policy-level evaluation exercises were useful, and seriously examined by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) of Japan for realization. However, there are limitations to conducting the evaluation under the current framework of the assignment, which are (1) low level of independence and (2) little resources. Frequent interactions between stakeholder-divisions of MOFA and the evaluation team, including comment-revision repetitions to finalize a review report, risk the independence of a review. Consequently, views of stakeholders may substantially influence the report. Second, resources in terms of money, time and personnel are minimal to do the job. This limitation in resources weakens the independence of evaluation further. Thus, these two aspects jointly result in a low level of authority and little publicity of the evaluation.