Sustainable development: a vague and ambiguous “theory”

Abstract

Purpose -The notion of "sustainable development" has had a short and tumultuous history, including a departure from economic reductionism by focusing on a multidimensional aspect and addressing the issues of its scope across many disciplines. It has become a project enabling a rethinking of capitalism based on the concept of a reformed type of capitalism. The purpose of this paper is to study this issue. Design/methodology/approach -The paper is based on the following arguments: the presentation of sustainable development as a "vague" theory, an empirical proof of this vagueness with regard to corporate actions whose justification is based around the notion of sustainable development, and finally the ambiguities of the notion. Findings -The notion of sustainable development raises the question of an apparent consensus on its correlates: solidarity, responsibility, equity, etc. It tends to establish a protean sense of the firms' responsibility, particularly the larger ones. The largely political dimension of the notion has today consequences on its usage. Sustainable development as addressed in the firm tends to take on the dimension of a management issue, which is likely to persist due to its larger political dimension. Originality/value -The paper provides insight on the catch-all dimension of the notion and its appealing rhetorical character and bases the ambiguity related with references to an "in-between." On the institutional level, it refers to a social and fair economy that stands arguably in between the state and the market. On the methodological level, it refers to heuristics of fear and hope.

Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade‐Offs Into Win–Win Outcomes

“…Put differently, in the age of globalization, it is increasingly difficult to find a universally accepted external criterion for judging societal processes. Of course, there is significant controversy over the notion of sustainability as well (Connely, ; Pesqueux, ), but it is possible to talk about sustainability without relying on an external normative criterion. Sustainability refers to the capacity to endure.…”

Exploring Circularity: A Review to Assess the Opportunities and Challenges to Close Loop in Nepali Tourism Industry

“…Additionally, the concept of a green economy was endorsed by UNEP as a low carbon, resources effi cient and socially inclusive economic model which results in improved human well-being and social equity, while signifi cantly reducing environmental risks and ecological scarcities (Fedrigo-Fazio & Brink, 2012). Both sustainable development and green economy are reported to be vague things and lack conceptual clarity (Pesqueux, 2009;Turok & Borel-Saladin, 2013). Also, the concept of sustainable development has claimed to be 'malleable' to those who were already benefi ting from business as usual scenario (Higgins-Desbiolles, 2018).…”

The Era of Sustainability: Promises, Pitfalls and Prospects for Sustainable Buildings and the Built Environment

“…Several scholars of different disciplines have studied and proposed a conceptualization of sustainable development originating in a vast set of meanings and contents for sustainability (see, for example, [5]). This shows on the one hand the vagueness of the concept [6] and on the other hand its interest across disciplines [7]. Since 1987, sustainability has become the distinctive feature of any discourse and sustainable development the only possible way to operate in any field.…”