2023
DOI: 10.3390/su15108077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable Development: A Comparison between the Finnish and the Italian Education Systems

Abstract: The quality of education is a political priority. The European Union contributes through the principle of subsidiarity. In the Finnish and Italian education systems, assessment becomes fundamental and is closely connected to qualitative organization and to the objective of providing reliable information to plan effective policies with an increase in learning outcomes at various levels (i.e., local, regional, and national). This research explores the Italian and Finnish education systems to outline how they fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We constructed sciencelearning motivation in this study in a general science domain; therefore, for future researchers conducting studies in specific science subjects, such as physics, chemistry, and biology, the items should be verified. Next, although our results regarding the factor structure of science-learning motivation can be considered more robust than previous TIMSS studies examining science motivation measurement models, in terms of the latent approach utilized in CFA analyses and the integration of multiple motivational theories, we acknowledge that these findings may lack generalizability given that students in this study were specific to the U.S. International large-scale datasets are always used to compare teaching and learning outcomes among various educational systems (e.g., Messina, 2023;Saal and Graham, 2023;and Zhang et al, 2023) [67][68][69], and the current study used U.S. data specifically; therefore, cultural differences should be taken into account in further studies. Considering the discrepancy of cultural and educational backgrounds and the complex nature of student motivation as it relates to their learning ecologies, future research, particularly studies that examine students' science-learning motivation from Eastern cultures, is warranted to generalize the findings in this study.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We constructed sciencelearning motivation in this study in a general science domain; therefore, for future researchers conducting studies in specific science subjects, such as physics, chemistry, and biology, the items should be verified. Next, although our results regarding the factor structure of science-learning motivation can be considered more robust than previous TIMSS studies examining science motivation measurement models, in terms of the latent approach utilized in CFA analyses and the integration of multiple motivational theories, we acknowledge that these findings may lack generalizability given that students in this study were specific to the U.S. International large-scale datasets are always used to compare teaching and learning outcomes among various educational systems (e.g., Messina, 2023;Saal and Graham, 2023;and Zhang et al, 2023) [67][68][69], and the current study used U.S. data specifically; therefore, cultural differences should be taken into account in further studies. Considering the discrepancy of cultural and educational backgrounds and the complex nature of student motivation as it relates to their learning ecologies, future research, particularly studies that examine students' science-learning motivation from Eastern cultures, is warranted to generalize the findings in this study.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%