2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-021-01512-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable Community Forest Management in Mexico: An Integrated Model of Three Socio-ecological Frameworks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current paradigm for developing regional ESPs is the study framework of "identifying ecological sources, building resistance surfaces, and extracting corridors" [4], [41]. With reference to earlier techniques, this study created a brand-new framework called "importance-sensitivity-disturbance" to construct ESPs (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current paradigm for developing regional ESPs is the study framework of "identifying ecological sources, building resistance surfaces, and extracting corridors" [4], [41]. With reference to earlier techniques, this study created a brand-new framework called "importance-sensitivity-disturbance" to construct ESPs (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APID land urbanization has put the ecosystem under tremendous pressure and degraded the ecological environment to varying degrees [1]. Long-term environmental issues like soil contamination, landscape fragmentation, and habitat loss have been brought on by human activities encroaching on ecological regions [2], [3], which, in the 21st century, is progressively emerging as a new problem for local ecological safety and the development of sustainable socio-ecological systems [4]. ESPs are an effective way to support natural urban living systems, maintain ecological security, and achieve smart growth [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly applicable in sociology and ecology, SES theory informs the management of resources like forests and water, informing policies for sustainable resource use (Cumming and Allen, 2017). Integrated socio-cultural elements, as proposed by de la Mora et al (2021), improve community access to natural resources. Notably, the SES theory contends that forest protection and management alone cannot prevent deforestation; engagement with neighboring communities and enhancement of their social welfare through institutional engagement are imperative.…”
Section: Review Of Theoretical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would help to foster a sense of ownership among community members and encourage them to protect forest reserve even in the absence of forest officers. The SES theory also highlights the importance of collective management of forests as a common resource (de la Mora et al, 2021), which can lead to greater support for JFM initiatives and increased participation in decision-making processes.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We derive a model that amalgamates three complementary analytical frameworks: SES, SFM, and ES. This integrated framework conceptualizes the key relationships among socioecological systems, sustainable forest management, and multilevel governance [15]. The MLG approach, also known as polycentric governance or nested hierarchies [16][17][18], is based on the assumption that the state is not the only entity capable of deciding and acting on the management of resources, opening the possibility for organization and polycentric action; that is, multiple decision-making centers can act independently but remain interconnected through networks of cooperation or competition [18,19].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%