2023
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/acaee1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable aviation fuels must control induced land use change: an integrated assessment modelling exercise for Brazil

Abstract: Bio-sustainable aviation fuels (bio-SAFs) are an important pillar of the aviation sector decarbonisation strategy in the mid-term. Here we assess the induced land-use change (LUC) implications of producing bio-SAFs in Brazil under different assumptions of forest conservation governance. We evaluate four bio-SAF routes via two main pathways: the Alcohol-to-Jet (ATJ) and the Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) syntheses. We chose the most promising agriculture-based feedstocks to produce bio-SAFs in mac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By introducing this system in the socio-economic models, we correctly represent farmers' trade-offs and opportunities when deciding how to better allocate land among single-cropping and doublecropping systems. This statement is reinforced by Fiorini et al (2023) 36 , which finds robust negative ILUC for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF) produced from second-crop corn in Brazil, bringing different scenarios. Examples of other second crops, also called double crops, are increasingly being noted in scientific literature [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By introducing this system in the socio-economic models, we correctly represent farmers' trade-offs and opportunities when deciding how to better allocate land among single-cropping and doublecropping systems. This statement is reinforced by Fiorini et al (2023) 36 , which finds robust negative ILUC for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF) produced from second-crop corn in Brazil, bringing different scenarios. Examples of other second crops, also called double crops, are increasingly being noted in scientific literature [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…62,63 However, the use of feedstocks such as corn (through the alcohol-to-jet pathway) and soybean (through hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids) for SAF production is linked with high land use expansion that limits our ability to scale. 64 The configurations for plant and microbial oil processing developed in this study may provide an avenue for even greener and more scalable biomass-based SAF. Further techno-economic and life cycle assessment studies are needed to quantify the potential benefits of plant/microbial oil pathways to oil-based biofuels and oleochemicals other than biodiesel.…”
Section: Critical Targets For Integrated Plant and Microbial Oil Bior...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Certain feedstocks, such as those cultivated on marginal or degraded lands, present lower ILUC risks, leading to significant reductions in GHG emissions [41]. Advanced biofuel pathways, like hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFAs) and Fischer-Tropsch (FT), have shown promise in reducing GHG emissions when appropriate safeguards are in place to minimize deforestation and other high-emission activities [86]. Another pathway for GHG reduction is the utilization of oilseed cover crops, which can serve as feedstocks for biofuels without requiring additional agricultural land.…”
Section: Reduction In Greenhouse Gas Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective land conservation strategies, combined with sustainable agricultural practices, are essential for ensuring that SAF contributes to environmental sustainability without causing undue harm to biodiversity and land use. The integration of SAF production with existing agricultural systems and the use of cover crops can help maintain biodiversity while providing a reliable source of biofuel feedstock [86,87].…”
Section: Biodiversity and Land Use Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%