Abstract:Sustainability reports, as a voluntary measure of companies and organisations, are an important instrument for supporting corporate social responsibility (CSR). The most recognized guidelines for sustainability reporting are the Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines. They aim to enable a reasonable and balanced presentation of a company's performance regarding economic, environmental, and social aspects, to all stakeholders. The paper selects the sustainability reports from four companies from the food indust… Show more
“…The proposed set of indicators are drawn from, and align strongly with, other existing indicators, including the relevant GRI standards and relevant reporting frameworks [35][36][37][38] and similar benchmarking initiatives, such as those developed by the World Benchmarking Alliance, the Food Foundation and Oxfam [33,34,47]. The proposed set of indicators are tailored to the sectors on which we focused and incorporate a wide range of domains commonly identified as important for comprehensively addressing environmental sustainability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GRI standards are designed to be used by any industry, with sector-specific standards for certain industries with a particularly high environmental impact, including agriculture and fishing. The indicators in the GRI standards were developed by consensus from a broad range of stakeholders [35,36], and are generally considered to be the de-facto international standard for environmental sustainability reporting [35,[37][38][39]. Limitations of GRI relevant to this research are that the GRI's focus on internal organisational performance largely ignores metrics related to an organisation's interactions with local ecological systems [37,40] and, arguably, discourages integrated thinking about the trade-offs between various indicators, particular where there may be conflict between financial, social and environmental performance [40].…”
There is widespread recognition that a transformation of food systems is needed to improve environmental sustainability. As part of efforts to hold food companies accountable for their role in improving the environmental sustainability of food systems, there is a critical role for monitoring and benchmarking of company actions. This study aimed to develop a proposed set of metrics for assessing the commitments and practices of food companies regarding environmental sustainability. Guided by an inventory of existing sustainability reporting frameworks and benchmarking initiatives, we proposed 37 indicators for assessment, categorised into ten domains, covering strategy, packaging, greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, water, biodiversity, food waste, compliance and reducing animal-sourced foods. We refined the indicators after consultation with academic experts. We discussed implementation feasibility with sustainability managers from three major food companies in New Zealand. Feedback highlighted the need to pilot test methods for applying the indicators in practice, including assessment of a company’s impact across the supply chain, refining indicator scoring criteria, and weighting indicators based on company- and sector-specific priority areas of focus. Assessment of food companies using the proposed set of metrics can improve accountability for action and inform government regulatory responses.
“…The proposed set of indicators are drawn from, and align strongly with, other existing indicators, including the relevant GRI standards and relevant reporting frameworks [35][36][37][38] and similar benchmarking initiatives, such as those developed by the World Benchmarking Alliance, the Food Foundation and Oxfam [33,34,47]. The proposed set of indicators are tailored to the sectors on which we focused and incorporate a wide range of domains commonly identified as important for comprehensively addressing environmental sustainability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GRI standards are designed to be used by any industry, with sector-specific standards for certain industries with a particularly high environmental impact, including agriculture and fishing. The indicators in the GRI standards were developed by consensus from a broad range of stakeholders [35,36], and are generally considered to be the de-facto international standard for environmental sustainability reporting [35,[37][38][39]. Limitations of GRI relevant to this research are that the GRI's focus on internal organisational performance largely ignores metrics related to an organisation's interactions with local ecological systems [37,40] and, arguably, discourages integrated thinking about the trade-offs between various indicators, particular where there may be conflict between financial, social and environmental performance [40].…”
There is widespread recognition that a transformation of food systems is needed to improve environmental sustainability. As part of efforts to hold food companies accountable for their role in improving the environmental sustainability of food systems, there is a critical role for monitoring and benchmarking of company actions. This study aimed to develop a proposed set of metrics for assessing the commitments and practices of food companies regarding environmental sustainability. Guided by an inventory of existing sustainability reporting frameworks and benchmarking initiatives, we proposed 37 indicators for assessment, categorised into ten domains, covering strategy, packaging, greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, water, biodiversity, food waste, compliance and reducing animal-sourced foods. We refined the indicators after consultation with academic experts. We discussed implementation feasibility with sustainability managers from three major food companies in New Zealand. Feedback highlighted the need to pilot test methods for applying the indicators in practice, including assessment of a company’s impact across the supply chain, refining indicator scoring criteria, and weighting indicators based on company- and sector-specific priority areas of focus. Assessment of food companies using the proposed set of metrics can improve accountability for action and inform government regulatory responses.
“…In developing countries, CSR reporting is more greatly influenced by the external forces/powerful stakeholders for instance, foreign investors, international buyers, international media and international regulatory bodies (Ali et al, 2017). To date, there is no country with an obligation for sustainable development reporting; nonetheless, Brazil was the leader in Latin America with 135 sustainability reports in 2010, in contrast with Costa Rica where only three reports were published, one of them by a company that produces beer, fruit-based drinks, bottled water, natural fruit drinks (Hoeltl et al, 2013). In fact, it was considered that CSR was stagnated in Central America and the Caribbean (Shah et al, 2016).…”
Corporate Social Responsibility in developing countries has become an emerging field of research. In this paper a model of structural equations is proposed to analyze the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility actions and its influence on Cooperation, Innovation and Performance in the agribusiness sector located in Costa Rica. Structural equation modeling was used to investigate the conceptual relationship model and explain the associations among variables. The model results suggest that CSR and Innovation positively influence Performance. On the contrary, it seems that Cooperation does not have an influence on Performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.