Sustainability project partnerships in times of crisis: conceptual framework and implications for stakeholder integration

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to analyze the requirements for stakeholder integration in sustainability project partnerships in times of sustainability crisis. Referring to the COVID-19 pandemic as a sustainability crisis that has sensitized consumers and other stakeholders to corporate responsibility for social and sustainability issues, a conceptual framework for stakeholder integration is developed from which implications for designing the potential, process and result quality are derived.Design/methodology/approachIn this conceptual paper, design options for stakeholder integration are derived from open innovation and service management research. Specific crisis-related determinants of stakeholder integration are derived from current corporate social responsibility (CSR) and crisis research taking into account the opportunities and challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design options and crisis-related determinants are then combined to a conceptual framework for stakeholder integration in sustainability project partnerships in times of crisis. Based on this framework, research propositions are derived that provide insights into the design of the potential, process and result quality of stakeholder integration.FindingsThis paper shows that the COVID-19 pandemic can be viewed as a sustainability crisis, which places special entrepreneurial demands on stakeholder integration in sustainability project partnerships. The pandemic offers potential for integrating a large number of stakeholders and has emphasized the need for integrating a broad range of stakeholders. Higher skepticism of stakeholders toward companies' CSR engagement in the pandemic has raised stakeholder demands for early integration. Higher skepticism and CSR involvement have rendered active forms of integration even more relevant, which, however, should still be adapted to the respective stakeholder prerequisites. The pandemic has increased the need for constant and comprehensive exchange of data on project results between stakeholders and the project leading organization. Measurement of target achievement can be promoted by establishing stakeholder commitment with regard to the target measures on the collective and relationship levels of the partnership. Finally, the pandemic has reinforced the need for more dialogical forms of communicating sustainability project results.Originality/valueSolving problems and exploiting opportunities in times of crisis require a high degree of entrepreneurship and creative leadership in order to gain new ideas and overcome resource deficits. Sustainability project partnerships in which various stakeholders contribute resources and knowledge to collaborate on idea development and finding solutions to sustainability issues are suitable for this. However, previous approaches to stakeholder integration in open innovation and service management research largely neglect the crisis context and only a few are related to sustainability. In CSR and crisis research, stakeholder-related approaches to coping with crises tend to be underrepresented, and the comprehensive concept of stakeholder integration has so far hardly been considered as an approach to crisis management. By taking into account the COVID-19 pandemic as a sustainability crisis, this paper provides new impulses for the integration of stakeholders in sustainability project partnerships in times of crisis. Recommendations for the design of the potential, process and result quality are derived, which provide insights for project leaders and stakeholders alike. In addition, implications for public policymakers are derived, who are assigned an increasingly active role in the pandemic and who can contribute to the success of sustainability project partnerships by setting suitable framework conditions. The developed concept can be expanded to include further company-related determinants and offers a starting point for empirical analysis in the still underexplored research fields of sustainability-oriented relationship marketing and sustainability crises.

Social Technology Methods to Engage Stakeholders in Social Enterprise Planning and Promote Sustainability and Entrepreneurship

“…Cooperation with various stakeholders makes it possible to compensate for possible own deficits and, simultaneously, achieve more effectively and efficiently common project-based sustainability goals and individual corporate goals (Grunwald et al, 2021). Where dialogue is a way of collaboration when it shows that it provides the conversations, connections and combinations allowing new insights into virtually all types of collective endeavors allowing social learning and individuals, groups and organizations to grow in their understanding of XLIII ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODUÇÃO "A contribuição da engenharia de produção para desenvolvimento sustentável das organizações: Cadeias Circulares, sustentabilidade e tecnologias" Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil, 17 a 20 de outubro de 2023.…”

Continuities of Public Service Innovations (PSIs) in Indonesia's Local Governments' Health Services: Whose Initiative Has a Higher Success Rate?

“…For example, in building applications for citizens or farmers, innovators should consider users' digital literacy, their system, and their needs to thrive (Dutta et al, 2021;Simelton & McCampbell, 2021). Stakeholders can be supported with resources and knowledge to solve continuity problems and meet their needs (Grunwald et al, 2021;Permatasari & Dellyana, 2021). The second is agile processes of publicprivate partnerships through open innovation platforms, open data platforms, participatory planning, and service integrations (J. H. Lee et al, 2014).…”

Not My Business: How Individuals’ Role Identities Shape Sensegiving During Corporate Sustainability Initiatives

“…Initial studies have investigated the factors that trigger and facilitate sensegiving, pointing out that sensegiving is enabled by leaders’ expertise, power, legitimacy, and opportunity (Hahn & Aragón-Correa, 2015; Maitlis & Lawrence, 2007). For example, studies in the context of sustainability have pointed out that, to gain support in times of change, managers designing sensegiving efforts must consider the audience and ensure the message resonates with employees (Frandsen et al, 2013; Grunwald et al, 2021). At the same time, existing studies focus largely on top and middle managers, shedding very limited light on the detailed responses of individual employees at lower levels (Maitlis & Christianson, 2014).…”