Sustainability of community engagement – in the hands of stakeholders?

Abstract

Purpose -The current gap in the field of community engagement is evaluation and measurement of the impacts on the stakeholders, mainly the community being engaged with. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach -This paper discusses the need to consider the stakeholder's perspective and their involvement in a community engagement initiative, or in any social program. The authors begin by debating the most common evaluation techniques used, followed by re-introducing stakeholder evaluation to the field of community engagement. Findings -The evaluation using the stakeholders' approach will not only create a holistic evaluation process, but will also assist in fostering a sense of ownership of the community engagement program. Originality/value -Community engagement is given much importance nowadays in Malaysia, especially in line with institutes of higher learning's tripartite mission, the third mission being the ability to engage with communities. It is not surprising because community engagement offers enormous benefits for regional and societal development. Community engagement relies heavily on partnership and mutual reciprocity between different stakeholders such as communities, universities, non-government organizations, field experts and funding organizations. In order to sustain the engagement initiatives, it is important to know who are the "owners" or stakeholders of the program.

What Do We Know About Community Engagement in Indigenous Education Contexts and How Might This Impact on Pathways into Higher Education?

“…Indeed, the term 'community engagement' means many different things to different people. There are various definitions across many disciplines with a general lack of consensus in academic scholarship and grey literature about how community engagement is actually best defined (Ramachandra and Mansor 2014). Likewise, the terms 'community' and 'engagement' are equally contested (Campbell 2008a, b;Dempsey 2010).…”

Water matters: An assessment of opinion on water management and community engagement in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom

“…Perceptions of what entails successful engagement can vary wildly, and even well established and internationally lauded bottom-up initiatives such as Australian Landcare have been criticised for being too ‘top-down’ in their approach [37]. In addition to facilitating wider opportunities for communities to become involved in local water management and other natural resource management initiatives, measuring and evaluating successful engagement should be a core component of a community engagement initiative, but is one that is frequently lacking [38]. Measuring the effectiveness of an engagement initiative is no easy task, and there are no standardised methods for measuring engagement success [39].…”

Mass Communication Research in Sustainability Science: Moving Toward an Engaged Approach to Address Society’s Sustainability Dilemma

“…Despite the adoption of new stakeholder-inclusive approaches to sustainability science, it remains a complex and challenging process (e.g. Corner, Pidgeon, & Parkhill, 2012;Pomeranz et al, 2014;Ramachandra & Naha Abu Mansor, 2014).…”