Sustainability of Biorefineries: Challenges and Perspectives

Abstract

Biorefineries have been defined as complex systems where biomass is integrally processed to obtain value-added products and energy vectors, involving recent research advances, technological trends, and sustainable practices. These facilities are evolving since new pathways and challenges for biomass upgrading appear constantly aimed at increasing process sustainability. Nevertheless, few literature papers summarize how these new trends can improve biorefinery sustainability and boost the transition to renewable resources. This paper reviews several challenges and future perspectives before biorefinery implementation at the industrial level. Challenges related to waste stream valorization, multifeedstock use, biorefinery energy matrix diversification, and new products based on new biomass conversion pathways are reviewed. Thus, this paper provides an overview of the most recent trends and perspectives for improving biorefinery sustainability based on waste stream minimization, integral use of raw materials, and high-value bio-based compound production. A case study is discussed to show how integral biomass upgrading can improve the economic and environmental performance of existing processing facilities. Carbon dioxide capture, storage, and conversion, as well as energy matrix diversification, have been identified as the most important aspects of improving the environmental performance of biorefineries (decarbonization). Moreover, multifeedstock biorefineries are profiled as promising options for upgrading several biomass sources in small-scale and modular systems to produce value-added products for boosting rural bioeconomies. Finally, new ways to produce more bio-based products must be proposed to replace existing oil-based ones.

Technological Tools Based on Artificial Intelligence in the Sugar Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Perspectives for Energy Efficiency

“…Research can focus on finding innovative ways to utilize waste from sugarcane processing. AI can help identify valuable byproducts and develop processes to convert them into marketable products, reducing waste and increasing profitability (Solarte-Toro & Cardona, 2023).…”

Design of a Bioreactor for Aerobic Biodegradation of Biowaste Based on Insight into Its Composition and Estimated Process Parameters

“…Sustainability, which is enshrined in the 17 "Sustainable Development Goals" (SDGs), has been defined as the perfect balance between the economic, environmental, and social aspects of a system, product, or process. This concept has been applied to describe the performance of different alternatives for biowaste (food waste and green waste) to obtain value-added products and energy vectors at the laboratory, pilot, bench, or industrial scale [5,6]. It is therefore very important to gain insight into the composition of biowaste as a heterogeneous mixture of different biodegradable components, its physico-chemical addition, the mass balance of the process is important information for the dimensioning of the required process spaces and equipment for biowaste treatment plants, such as input and output storage, bioreactors for intensive decomposition, areas for compost maturation, etc.…”

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for the Bioeconomy: The Case of the Production of Tramadol from 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran

“…The interdependence of economic, social, and environmental dimensions makes the performance of the bioeconomy uncertain, requiring a comprehensive assessment through a life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) as proposed by Solarte-Toro et al This method jointly evaluates the different dimensions of sustainability from a life cycle perspective through life cycle assessment (LCA) for the environmental pillar, life cycle costing (LCC) for the economic pillar, and social life cycle assessment (SLCA) for the social pillar. − Integrating the three assessment methodologies presents significant challenges due to a lack of guidance, particularly in interpreting and communicating the results. − Recognizing this, the Life Cycle Initiative published 10 principles for applying LCSA, whose degree of alignment with practice was reviewed by Leroy-Parmentier et al, showing a gap between these principles and the existing practice.…”