2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Sustainability is a nice bonus” the role of sustainability in carsharing from a consumer perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
57
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the increased public awareness of CO 2 emissions and their detrimental effect on climate change, it seems that not only value seeking and convenience benefits (Botsman and Rogers, 2010;Schaefers, 2013) but also environmental benefits represent important drivers of carsharing usage intention. This finding contradicts extant literature that states that ecological benefits are only a nice side effect of using carsharing services (Hartl et al, 2018). One possible explanation for the relevance of ecological benefits in the current study might be the reliance on a label communicating a specific benefit (fewer CO 2 emissions) of the carsharing service.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the increased public awareness of CO 2 emissions and their detrimental effect on climate change, it seems that not only value seeking and convenience benefits (Botsman and Rogers, 2010;Schaefers, 2013) but also environmental benefits represent important drivers of carsharing usage intention. This finding contradicts extant literature that states that ecological benefits are only a nice side effect of using carsharing services (Hartl et al, 2018). One possible explanation for the relevance of ecological benefits in the current study might be the reliance on a label communicating a specific benefit (fewer CO 2 emissions) of the carsharing service.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, we postulate that the perception of ecological benefits is driving carsharing usage. While there is a growing interest in sustainable products and services (Atkinson and Rosenthal, 2014), environmental benefits have been identified as a nice add-on rather than a driver of carsharing usage (e.g., Lindloff et al, 2014;Hartl et al, 2018;Ramos et al, 2020). Our research offers new important insights into the role of perceived ecological perspective, even more dramatic figures are reported in the San Francisco Bay area for public transit: In November, the use of public transportation was 90% below the pre-pandemic level (Cohen, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research in the sharing economy has focused on users of sharing services. Their motives to use sharing services of products they do not own are well investigated (Hamari, Sjoklint, & Ukkonen, 2016; Hartl, Sabitzer, Hofmann, & Penz, 2018; Hawlitschek, Teubner, & Gimpel, 2016). A common finding is that economic and pragmatic rather than environmental and idealistic considerations dominate the decision to consume sharing services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] Environmental concern and a sustainability mindset have become prominent in society, to which the circular economy promises to respond-often rebranded as the "sharing economy"-by using existing resources more efficiently, reducing waste and surplus, refurbishing goods, facilitating donations and recirculation systems, and discouraging new acquisitions through rental services. Previous research shows that sustainability is not the primary driver of the "sharing economy" (the economic incentive and social benefits are), but a "nice bonus" (Hartl et al 2018), an "unintended consequence" (Botsman and Rogers 2010a, p. 74) or a byproduct (Wilhelm et al 2017a), as it is most often not significant in survey research (Habibi et al 2016;Hamari et al 2016;Möhlmann 2015).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%