Sustainability: How Stakeholder Perceptions Differ from Corporate Reality

Abstract

A strong reputation is widely acknowledged to be the most valuable asset of a firm, and sustainability has become an important component of corporate reputation. Many stakeholders, from customers to investors to employees to purchasing managers, report that sustainability is an important factor in their decision-making processes. However, sustainability messages have become ubiquitous–almost table stakes–for most large firms. In such an active marketplace, especially for firms who have not pursued leadership positions, it is difficult for companies to use sustainability to create meaningful differentiation from competitors and thus benefit from their investments. There is often a major gap between stakeholder perceptions and firm performance. Firms that integrate sustainability into their culture and business practices are better able to integrate sustainability messaging into mainstream communications.

Giving the Gift of Goodness: An Exploration of Socially Responsible Gift-Giving

“…Thus, our study of the role of CSR in giftgiving is essentially the attitude-behavior gap in reverse order, where a stated lack of concern for CSR activities nonetheless corresponds to support for such activities. In addressing this gap, the current study finds that the gift-giving process is one means by which consumers become more aware of CSR initiatives, which could serve to address low levels of awareness of CSR activities among consumers (Carrigan and Attalla 2001;Du et al 2007;Peloza et al 2012). …”

Environmental Sustainability as a Source of Product Innovation: The Role of Governance Mechanisms in Manufacturing Firms

“…Facing this gap, Nidumolu et al [18] argued that smart companies now treat sustainability as innovation's new frontier in their seminal paper. This proposition was echoed by Peloza et al's [26] global survey, which called for future research to investigate the relationship between ES and the innovation culture of a firm. Despite the repeated calls by a few pioneering studies such as Porter and Kramer [4] and Kiron et al [17], to the best of the authors' knowledge, the possible influence of ES on innovation has largely remained conceptual and anecdotal.…”

Sustainable Evolution for Global Business: A Synthetic Review of the Literature

“…Faupel & Schwach (2010) state that corporate sustainable practices are those that satisfy the needs of the direct and indirect stakeholders, and Peloza, Loock, Cerruti, & Muyot (2012) recognize the stakeholder reputation as the most valuable asset of a firm. Nadeem (2013) contends that holistic integration of corporate sustainability maximizes stakeholder value.…”

“…Salzmann et al (2005) argue that there is an insufficient understanding of business logic for adopting corporate sustainability strategies. As a result, the ambiguity of the sustainability is still frequently mentioned in the literature (Aras & Crowther, 2008;Hakensen, 2010;Linnenluecke & Griffiths, 2010;Reinecke, Manning, & von Hagen, 2012;Peloza et al, 2012;Valente, 2012;Alhaddi, 2015). Vallester, Lindgren, & Moan (2012) note that many firms and practitioners remain in a state of confusion as to finding ways that would benefit both the firm and society at large.…”