2016
DOI: 10.3384/diss.diva-127393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability for Whom? : The Politics of Imagining Environmental Change in Education

Abstract: Global initiatives regarding environmental change have increasingly become part of political agendas and of our collective imagination. In order to form sustainable societies, education is considered crucial by organizations such as the United Nations and the European Union. But how is the notion of sustainability imagined and formed in educational practices? What does sustainability make possible, and whom does it involve? These critical questions are not often asked in educational research on sustainability.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
3
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, according to the informants' implicit logic, teaching about sustainable development is not only deeply politicised. It also entirely excludes self-reflection on this point, and works according to the idea that there is a prevailing consensus that established socioeconomic and political conditions should be the obvious-or even only-starting point for teaching within this field in Swedish schools [49]. The reason for this is probably that teaching on sustainable development is complex, as it involves not only nature, but also the whole "technosystem" of societal markets and administrations and the technologies that they involve [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, according to the informants' implicit logic, teaching about sustainable development is not only deeply politicised. It also entirely excludes self-reflection on this point, and works according to the idea that there is a prevailing consensus that established socioeconomic and political conditions should be the obvious-or even only-starting point for teaching within this field in Swedish schools [49]. The reason for this is probably that teaching on sustainable development is complex, as it involves not only nature, but also the whole "technosystem" of societal markets and administrations and the technologies that they involve [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…På ett liknande sätt visar Hanna Sjögren (2016) hur fokusgrupper kan destabilisera den maktrelation mellan intervjuare och intervjuad som ofta uppstår i en individuell intervju. Sjögren (2016) använder i fokusgruppintervjuer olika typer av stimulusmaterial, som exempelvis dikter och bilder. Dessa material i sig bidrar till nya diskussioner och kan också öppna upp för svar och diskussioner som enbart frågor ibland inte kan göra.…”
Section: Fokusgrupperunclassified
“…Med utgångspunkt i en postkvalitativ metodologi kan således materialen förstås som performativa aktörer som på nya och andra sätt bidrar till produktionen av kunskap. Något som blir särskilt intressant kopplat till postkvalitativa tankegångar är hur Sjögren (2016) betonar att urvalet av dikter och bilder kan förstås utifrån Haraways (2008a) situeringsbegrepp. Själva praktiken att välja -och välja bort -visst material som presenteras för fokusgruppen blir på detta sätt en inbjudan till deltagarna att få förståelse för forskarens föreställningar om det studerade fenomenet.…”
Section: Fokusgrupperunclassified
“…The context for contempoary explorations about how we can think with the world is shaped by global challenges, especially in respect of climatic changes and environmental degradation (Staunaes & Krejsler, 2013;Sjögren 2016, Bergstedt, 2017aJuelskjaer, 2020). One of the reasons for this is that Vitruvian man of the Anthropocene (Braidotti, 2013) is central to all knowledge creation based upon dualist divisions between subject and object and between people and matter (Barad 2007, Braidotti 2013, Grusin 2015.…”
Section: Knowledge In An Anthropocentric Agementioning
confidence: 99%