Sustainability conflicts in the blue economy: planning for offshore aquaculture and offshore wind energy development in Norway

Abstract

Blue economy developments entail an industrialization of the world’s ocean and coastal areas, placing growing pressures on the marine environment and ecosystems. Moreover, the competition for ocean space and resources increases the likelihood for social conflicts. Marine spatial planning has been presented as a tool that can avoid or mitigate conflicts. However, there is a need for a more thorough analysis of the conflicts linked to the blue economy. The objective of this paper is to analyze characteristics of blue economy conflicts and how they are shaped by the institutional context and sustainability discourses. This study also explores perspectives on conflict management and pathways toward sustainable transformations in marine planning. Empirically, we use two case studies of blue growth industries in Norway: (1) offshore wind energy development and (2) offshore aquaculture development. Through these cases, we take a close look at the established principles and procedures which regulate conflicts. Our study shows how current blue economy conflicts are framed and handled through institutionalized practices of conflict management. Our findings are twofold. First, blue economy conflicts are not easily categorized through common conflict typologies (i.e., user-user, user-environment) but increasingly appear to be sustainability conflicts in which all actors use sustainability as a frame of reference for discussing possible and desirable futures. Second, conflicts are not necessarily a negative social process. In fact, conflicts often uncover unsustainable practices and create potential positive pathways for sustainable transformations.

Regional Dynamics and Economic Sustainability of Mariculture Firms in Portugal: A Financial Performance Analysis

“…Size Trends: The study's findings regarding the financial performance of larger versus smaller firms resonate with the literature on economies of scale versus flexibility [13,44]. Balancing these factors is essential for firms of all sizes to thrive, as emphasized in prior research [16].…”

“…Mariculture research primarily focuses on production and economic aspects, often utilizing on-farm trials and sustainable livelihood frameworks [8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) systems are increasingly recognized for their potential to enhance sustainability in mariculture.…”

The Sustainable Brazilian Blue Economy: A Blue Powershoring and Blue Watershoring Strategy

“…Moreover, the capture of wild fish is not expected to grow worldwide, reflecting the overfishing of stocks, thus hurting capture fisheries from around the globe. And aquaculture may be largely responsible for an increase in the capture of species such as shrimp, salmon, and anchovies, used to prepare fish meal for fish and seafood farms (Ababouch & Carolu, 2015;Knol-Kauffman, Nielsen, Sander, & Arbo, 2023).…”