2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability Assessment of Road Marking Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Premium materials are compared with standard materials in terms of service life, costs, and environmental impact. For the assessment, analysed was not a one-time event of road marking application, but their series until the expected roadway surface renovation, which was assumed to be 10 years, as in the LCA [8,20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Premium materials are compared with standard materials in terms of service life, costs, and environmental impact. For the assessment, analysed was not a one-time event of road marking application, but their series until the expected roadway surface renovation, which was assumed to be 10 years, as in the LCA [8,20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to two separate LCA performed according to ISO 14040 protocols [36] on thin layer road marking systems, the main impactor was not the selection of materials, but the overall durability of the systems [8,20]. While different types of road marking materials were reported as being better or worse in the separate LCA categories, the differences appeared insignificant as long as the same service life was achieved.…”
Section: Sustainability Of Road Marking Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The four major binder-based marking systems assessed were solvent-borne paint; water-based (WB) paint; thermoplastic and thermo spray plastic; methyl methacrylate cold plastic and methyl methacrylate cold spray plastic, also referred to as methyl methacrylate (Mirabedini et al, 2020;Hadizadeh et al, 2020;Cruz et al, 2016). Water-based roadmarking (WBRM) paints are environmentally friendly due to their water-based resin composition and low level of volatile organic compounds (VOC) (Fatemi et al, 2006;Burghardt and Pashkevich, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in roadway marking visibility have included streetlight design, alternative glass beads, LED markers, fluorescent materials, and now, phosphorescent materials (Nance and Sparks, 2020). The life cycle assessment results, considering the whole life cycle from manufacturing to disposal, showed that a global warming potential reduction of more than 50% can be achieved by a more durable road marking system (Cruz et al, 2016). The service life and photodegradation resistance of RM paint can be improved by using lignin addition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%