Sustainability assessment of flood mitigation projects: An innovative decision support framework

Abstract

Sustainability assessment methods have been emerging around the world, mostly for national or regional level plans, but very few are related to flood mitigation projects. This article proposes a new innovative decision support framework for sustainability assessment (SA) of flood mitigation projects throughout the project life cycle, focusing on two main aspects: sustained flood mitigation by the project, and enabling of sustainable development of the floodplain. This study has employed a review of the life cycle of flood mitigation projects, a review of sustainability assessment methodologies, consultations with experts and case studies involving two flood mitigation projects in Australia. Conforming to the project life cycle, the decision support framework is developed incorporating five stages: 1) contextualizing the project with regard to floodplain sustainability, 2) SA during planning and implementation for integrating sustainability issues in the project, 3) SA during a flood event to assess the sustainability performance of the project 4) SA at periodic intervals, and 5) SA at the stage of modification or changing to a new project. The framework has adopted a multicriteria analysis (MCA) approach using sustainability criteria and indicators to determine the sustainability index for the project. This paper describes the process of selecting indicators, defining the weightages and scores for indicators, and determines a sustainability index for various stages of the project. This framework will enhance decision making for sustainability of flood mitigation projects. Adapting this framework to projects in other development sectors is also envisaged.

Determinants of Flooding and Strategies for Mitigation: Two-Year Case Study of Benin City

“…Second, mitigating flooding is not the work of government alone. Studies have found that community action groups working with government and NGOs can help to ameliorate flooding in low-capital and flood-prone communities [41,42]. Thus, increased public awareness of the potential hazard of floods would help to properly inform developers and urban residents.…”

Sustainability Assessment of Sewerage Infrastructure Projects: A Conceptual Framework

“…2) Extension projects linked to the network The alternatives are limited in this kind of project, and the best solutions are based on existing sewerage. The alternative design is based on other studies [52], [53], but the indicators are different. 3) Rehabilitation projects Rehabilitation technologies are assessed to suit the type of damage in the pipes.…”

Debt and Deficit Growth Rate Reporting for Post-Communist European Union Member States

“…Conversely, instability in economic policy (i.e., on a macroeconomic level) directly relates to the risk of losing on investment (Eaton 1993;Serven 1997;Agénor and Montiel 2005). As such, most studies indicate the influence of GGD on economic growth (i.e., related to investments) as negative (Deshpande 1997;Pattollo et al 2011;Clements et al 2003;Shah et al 2017;Smyth and Hsing 1995;Lin and Sosin 2001;Brzozowski et al 2006). Cross-sectional analysis comparing developed and developing countries indicates GGD as a negative factor on economic growth (N'Zue 2018; Brzozowski et al 2006;Pegkas 2018).…”