Sustainability Assessment of a Low-Income Building: A BIM-LCSA-FAHP-Based Analysis

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the most significant consumers of environmental resources worldwide. Faced with the need to produce new buildings, but without further burdening the environment, attempts to improve social, economic, and environmental indicators have turned attention to building construction in recent decades. The objective of this research is to develop a novel framework to assess the most sustainable choice of materials applied to the construction of low-income buildings, according to the three pillars of the Triple Bottom Line (TBL). A BIM-LCSA-FAHP-based model was proposed with the creation of nine different scenarios, where the materials of the structure (precast concrete, cast-in-place concrete, and structural masonry), painting (PVA water-based and acrylic), and roofing (ceramic and fiber cement tiles) varied. The proposed procedure consists of the elaboration of a 3D Building Information Modeling (BIM) model, for which the parameters described above were evaluated according to the Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)-TBL-based criteria, divided into ten sub-criteria, that includes: (1) environmental (acidification, eutrophication, global warming, ozone depletion, smog formation, primary energy, non-renewable energy, and mass total), (2) economic (construction cost) and (3) socio-political issues (community impact). Finally, the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used as a multi-criteria decision-making technique that helps in aggregating and classifying the impacts of each scenario in a sustainability index (SI). Regarding the best option for low-income construction, the results indicated that precast concrete when combined with acrylic paint and fiber cement tiles (scenario 3) proved to be the most advantageous and achieved first place in the sustainability index (SI) developed in this work. This methodology is replicable for different construction typologies and several categories of materials, making it a robust decision-aiding tool for engineers, architects, and decision makers.

Sustainability Performance in On-Site Construction Processes: A Systematic Literature Review

“…Based on the conducted review, a strategic selection of sustainable KPIs can align construction practices more closely with global sustainability goals and frameworks [31]. Systems focused on O-SCP, as concluded by [47], offer numerous benefits, such as pollution control and optimized resource allocation [48,49]. These systems also foster improved compliance with regulations, risk assessment, and proactive problem prevention [26].…”

LCIA Parameters and the Role of BIM towards Sustainability: Regional and Temporal Trends

“…The assessment included different impact parameters, i.e., global warming, abiotic depletion, acidification, etc. In a similar study, Filho, da Costa [39] used BIM in the context of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment comprising socio-economic and environmental aspects. A study by Peng [40] contended that the estimation of carbon emissions over a building's life cycle can be simplified by BIM and Ecotect as they can supply most of the relevant information required for LCA calculations.…”

Sensitivity Analysis on the Operating Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings in China

“…For such assessment, the energy efficiency label is potential solution widely praised for its simple and intuitive structure, easy-to-understand, small investment, and obvious benefits. Studies have shown that public buildings consume a great amount of energy during the entire life cycle, so their energy efficiency has received extensive attention from many researchers [3][4][5][6] .…”