Sustainability and Quality Management: has EFQM fostered a Sustainability Orientation that delivers to stakeholders?

Abstract

PurposeAs a Quality Management (QM) framework, the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Excellence Model has stakeholder management at its core. In EFQM (2012), based on which assessments were made until 2021, “creating a sustainable future” was a fundamental principle, but how it translated to a Sustainability Orientation and delivered to stakeholders remains questionable. This study aims to investigates the Sustainability Orientation within EFQM (2012) and its associations with Results for stakeholders.Design/methodology/approachLongitudinal assessments of recognized-for-excellence organizations by a partner of EFQM are considered. Using factor analysis, scores on the sub-criteria that defined “creating a sustainable future” are investigated, and a Sustainability Orientation is inferred. Panel regressions and structural equation modeling assess the correlations between Sustainability Orientation and Results. A qualitative analysis follows, where sustainability reports from role-models within this population are text mined to examine whether and how they reflected the guidance in EFQM (2012) concerning “creating a sustainable future”.FindingsDirect and indirect positive associations between the Sustainability Orientation implied by EFQM (2012) and stakeholder-performance are confirmed. Yet, inferences from text mining of reported priorities of role-models of excellence illustrate that EFQM (2012) might have driven different strategies towards sustainability.Originality/valueDespite conceptualizations that the EFQM model embeds a Sustainability Orientation, to the best of the researchers’ knowledge, its existence and likely impact remain to be examined. By combining longitudinal statistical analysis, structural equation models and text mining, consistent insights on the link between Sustainability Orientation and organizational performance are obtained.

Antecedents and consequences of procurement managers' willingness to pay for sustainability: a multi-level perspective

“…Individual values, not competencies, influence WTP, whereas the context – institutional pressure – significantly influences both WTP and sustainable procurement; an ethical culture influences neither WTP nor sustainable procurement but influences WTP via a mediation effect through individual values. Individual competencies, finally, are very important to implementing sustainable procurement: We thus complement extant studies examining individual competencies for successful operations management (Schulze and Bals, 2020; Stek and Schiele, 2021) and shed further light on antecedents of sustainability (de Menezes et al. , 2022).…”

Sustainable Development and Implementation of Quality Management Excellence Models in Public Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review

“…The main purpose of a thematic analysis is to create an analytical and systematic record of the findings and themes that emerge from the interviews with or observations of the participants. It is a time-consuming, laborious and complex method of analysis, which requires the researchers to have special experience and knowledge to reduce the error and draw valid conclusions [101].…”

Sustainable development through quality management: a multiple-case study analysis of triumphs, trials and tribulations

“…QM emphasises customer attention, continuous improvement, and fact-based choices via concepts, processes, and tools (Hellsten and Klefsjö, 2000). It pertains to doing things right the first time (De Menezes et al, 2022), essential for demonstrating sustainable development in organisations (Isaksson et al, 2023). QM stems from the recognition that the products supplied to customers and services rendered to them constitute the pivotal element in sustaining and increasing the customer base (Stanciu et al, 2014).…”