1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002270050405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suspension feeding in the brittle-star Ophiothrix fragilis  : efficiency of particle retention and implications for the use of encounter-rate models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The juveniles are found with arms flat on the sponge, and the same is true for larger specimens hiding near the sponges and projecting their arms over the sponges, contrasting with the arm-raised posture of individuals in crevices and in aggregations (Broom 1975). This predominantly suspension-feeding ophiuroid captures particles by direct interception by raising its arms above the substratum (Warner 1971, Warner & Woodley 1975, Davoult & Gounin 1995, Allen 1998. We suggest that small juveniles with short arms cannot capture food efficiently, and that they rely on the feeding currents generated by sponges to increase the rate of contact with particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The juveniles are found with arms flat on the sponge, and the same is true for larger specimens hiding near the sponges and projecting their arms over the sponges, contrasting with the arm-raised posture of individuals in crevices and in aggregations (Broom 1975). This predominantly suspension-feeding ophiuroid captures particles by direct interception by raising its arms above the substratum (Warner 1971, Warner & Woodley 1975, Davoult & Gounin 1995, Allen 1998. We suggest that small juveniles with short arms cannot capture food efficiently, and that they rely on the feeding currents generated by sponges to increase the rate of contact with particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Grazer; suspension feeder Tillin et al (2006), Allen (1998), Warner and Woodley (1975), Roushdy and Hansen (1960), Davoult and Gounin (1995), Vevers (1956) …”
Section: Ophiothrix Fragilismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 for an experimental study). In stark contrast to this bias in study, many particle processes involve Reynolds numbers in this range [for example: filter feeding animals (4,6,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)17) (Re Ն 1); marine snow formation (18) (Re ϭ 0. ; and for airborne pollen, spores and dust (19) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%