2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suspended sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and exports during storm-events to the Tuross estuary, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies characterizing variability in responses of catchment nutrient exports to storm events have focused mainly on single parameters, such as nitrate [Chen et al, 2012;Carey et al, 2014], fluorescent dissolved organic matter [Saraceno et al, 2009], or phosphate [Bowes et al, 2005], although in recent years a growing number have considered varying responses between nutrient types [Drewry et al, 2009;Pellerin et al, 2012;Outram et al, 2014]. Moreover, very few studies have investigated how changes in hydroclimatology, both during and preceding storm events, control river nutrient export and source zone activation under extreme flow conditions, despite a clear requirement for this information for the effective management of catchment water resources both now and under future climate regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies characterizing variability in responses of catchment nutrient exports to storm events have focused mainly on single parameters, such as nitrate [Chen et al, 2012;Carey et al, 2014], fluorescent dissolved organic matter [Saraceno et al, 2009], or phosphate [Bowes et al, 2005], although in recent years a growing number have considered varying responses between nutrient types [Drewry et al, 2009;Pellerin et al, 2012;Outram et al, 2014]. Moreover, very few studies have investigated how changes in hydroclimatology, both during and preceding storm events, control river nutrient export and source zone activation under extreme flow conditions, despite a clear requirement for this information for the effective management of catchment water resources both now and under future climate regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations for nitrogen compounds are consistent with those of Zhu et al (2011), who noted that only 25% of NO 3 ÁN and 35% of TN were exported in stormflow, and Schilling and Zhang (2004) who found that more than 50% of NO 3 ÁN was exported in baseflow in two central Iowa catchments with mixed land use. In direct contrast, Drewry et al (2009) found that 96% and 93% of NO 3 ÁN and TN loads were transported in storm events monitored in South Australia.…”
Section: Stormflow Versus Baseflowmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example Drewry et al (2009), in their study of storm events, observed highest pollutant loads for an event which followed a prolonged dry spell. However, for this study, the event which transported the lowest pollutant loads occurred in late summer after a prolonged dry spell.…”
Section: Stormflow Versus Baseflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that precipitation is the most significant factor on water, chemical and nutrient loads which influence the water quality in streams. Generally, small scale sites have a clear positive rela-tionship between the loads of leached nutrient and rainfall [25]. Previous study reported that the changes in the nutrient concentrations of the drainage water over rainfall events indicated the transport of the particulate materials and of the nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus were mainly influenced by direct runoff and base flow, respectively [6].…”
Section: Nutrient Loss In Surface Water Throughmentioning
confidence: 99%