1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(75)90012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility to the acquisition of a conditioned response in relation to the menstrual cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

1977
1977
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained are generally consistent with our hypotheses and, respecting acquisition, parallel the data reported by Asso & Beech (1975). The women tested pre-menstrually show, as predicted, increased susceptibility to acquisition of GSR responsivity and, furthermore, show resistance to extinction when compared with a group of women examined inter-menstrually.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results obtained are generally consistent with our hypotheses and, respecting acquisition, parallel the data reported by Asso & Beech (1975). The women tested pre-menstrually show, as predicted, increased susceptibility to acquisition of GSR responsivity and, furthermore, show resistance to extinction when compared with a group of women examined inter-menstrually.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Some have found no menstrual cycle phase differences in catecholamine excretion (adrenaline and noradrenaline), skin conductance, heart rate, and respiratory rate (Slade & Jenner, 1979;Patkai, Johannsen, & Post, 1974) while others find higher or lower levels of ANS arousal in the premenstrual phase (Asso & Beach, 1975;Little & Zahn, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Little and Zahn found a significant increase in heart rate, respiration rate, and body temperature during the luteal phase (2). Asso and Beech and Vila and Beech found increased autonomic activity during the premenstrual phase using GSR (3,4). However, the issue was complicated in the Vila and Beech study, since they used phobic subjects (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%