2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0940-2993(00)80049-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility to secondary bacterial infections in growing pigs as an early response in ochratoxicosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent to which OTA may interact with other components of commercial chicken rations compounded from agricultural produce may also influence the significance of the relatively lower doses of OTA that commercial chickens may encounter in some feed. Moreover, OTA induced nephropathies in pigs or chickens have been previously related to an increased sensibility to bacterial infections [8,30], which could additionally complicate the clinicomorphological picture of these nephropathies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which OTA may interact with other components of commercial chicken rations compounded from agricultural produce may also influence the significance of the relatively lower doses of OTA that commercial chickens may encounter in some feed. Moreover, OTA induced nephropathies in pigs or chickens have been previously related to an increased sensibility to bacterial infections [8,30], which could additionally complicate the clinicomorphological picture of these nephropathies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies clearly confirmed that immunosuppression may be the first expressed toxic effect of some mycotoxins, such as ochratoxin A (Stoev et al, 2000). It was also found that FB 1 given at diet levels of 10 ppm, has immunosuppressive effect on humoral immune response in pigs (Stoev et al, 2012) and therefore can provoke some secondary bacterial infections, which arise in immunocompromised animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The most mycotoxins have strong immunosuppressive effects and often compromise animals and human health provoking development of secondary bacterial infections (Stoev et al, 2000) or deteriorating some existing diseases (Pósa et al, 2011(Pósa et al, , 2013. It is well known, that Fumonisin B 1 (FB 1 ) is one of the most frequent contaminant of the feeds for pigs in all over the world (Dutton, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies describe an increased susceptibility to experimental or natural mucosal infections after the ingestion of some mycotoxins [18,32,33]. Hara-Kudo et al [21] examined the effects of DON on Salmonella Enteritidis infection in mice and suggested that administration of 2 mg/L DON in the drinking water reduced resistance to peroral infection of Salmonella Enteritidis presumably by inhibiting the cell-mediated immune function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%