2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-2259-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility to conditioned place preference induced by addictive drugs in mice of the C57BL/6 and DBA/2 inbred strains

Abstract: The results demonstrate that C57 and DBA mice differ in their sensitivity to cocaine- and morphine-induced CPP and suggest that the two strains differ in sensitivity to the positive incentive properties of drugs of abuse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
81
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For place conditioning with pharmacological stimuli, one of the patterns was consistently paired with saline and the other with cocaine (20 mg/kg i.p., CPP) or LiCl (3.0 meq/kg i.p., CPA) during the conditioning phase. These doses were chosen on the basis of previous studies showing that C57BL/6JIco mice display a stronger CPP at a cocaine dose of 20 mg/kg (30,31) and a trend toward aversion in CPA test at a LiCl dose of 3.0 meq/kg (32). For animals in the control group, both chambers were paired with saline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For place conditioning with pharmacological stimuli, one of the patterns was consistently paired with saline and the other with cocaine (20 mg/kg i.p., CPP) or LiCl (3.0 meq/kg i.p., CPA) during the conditioning phase. These doses were chosen on the basis of previous studies showing that C57BL/6JIco mice display a stronger CPP at a cocaine dose of 20 mg/kg (30,31) and a trend toward aversion in CPA test at a LiCl dose of 3.0 meq/kg (32). For animals in the control group, both chambers were paired with saline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inbred mouse strains do differ in a number of drug related phenotypes [43][44][45][46][47][48]. Many of these phenotypes have now been studied in "quantitative trait locus" paradigms.…”
Section: B Studies Of Murine Strain Differences In Drug Related Phenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is thus some rationale for seeking addiction-associated variants in murine genes that have survived selection pressures on mice as potential models for common addiction-associated human variants that have also survived evolutionary selection pressures on humans. If there are a limited number of genes that can contain variants likely to influence vulnerability to addiction, not provide lethality and not provide strong negative selection, some of these genes from such a group may be more likely than a random group of genes to contain both murine strain differences and common human allelic variants that influence addiction phenotypes.Inbred mouse strains do differ in a number of drug related phenotypes [43][44][45][46][47][48]. Many of these phenotypes have now been studied in "quantitative trait locus" paradigms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well documented that the D2 inbred strain is resistant to the locomotor stimulant effects of opioid agonists, including morphine (Belknap et al, 1989(Belknap et al, , 1998Orsini et al, 2005;Fadda et al, 2005;Cunningham et al, 1992;Gwynn and Domino, 1984;Hynes and Berkowitz, 1982;Collins and Whitney, 1978;Brase et al, 1977), heroin (Bailey et al, 2010;Castellano et al, 1976), and methadone (Middaugh and Zemp, 1976). We confirmed this lack of sensitivity to fentanyl-induced locomotor activity in D2 mice, and thus only examined fentanyl sensitivity in B6.D2 Csnk1e mice and their B6.B6 Csnk1e wild-type littermates.…”
Section: Fentanyl Sensitivity In B6d2 Csnk1e Micementioning
confidence: 99%