2002
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-1-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 1, there were six isolates recognized as PZA resistant by the Bactec test, but did not have any mutation in their gene sequences. As suggested before [5], [26], these six isolates might not be resistant to PZA at all. Without considering these 6 isolates, the agreement would be 88% (15/17) for PZA resistant strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 1, there were six isolates recognized as PZA resistant by the Bactec test, but did not have any mutation in their gene sequences. As suggested before [5], [26], these six isolates might not be resistant to PZA at all. Without considering these 6 isolates, the agreement would be 88% (15/17) for PZA resistant strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an important first-line anti-tuberculosis drug used in combination with isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol in the short-course treatment regimens recommended by the WHO [3]. While the procedures for susceptibility testing of the first-line and second-line drugs have been well standardized in both liquid and solid media, the PZA susceptibility test is challenging because the bactericidal activity of PZA is optimal only in an acid environment (pH 5.5–5.6) that inhibits the growth of M. tuberculosis isolates [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…False resistance results are known to occur with this assay (1,2), which may be the result of alkalinization of the medium due to a high inoculum size or the presence of bovine serum albumin (3). The uses of alternative susceptibility breakpoint concentrations or different media are additional factors that may contribute to disparities in PZA susceptibility results (4)(5)(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negatively charged POA (pK a of 2.9) is then eliminated from the cytoplasm by an unidentified mechanism. Once in the mildly acidic extracellular milieu (typically pH ϳ6 for PZA susceptibility assays [25]), a small proportion of extracellular POA becomes protonated and passively diffuses back into the cytoplasm. In the slightly alkaline cytoplasm (pH 7.4) (26), POA becomes deprotonated, completing the cycle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%