1996
DOI: 10.1017/s000748530005241x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of larvae of the sandflyPhlebotomus papatasi(Diptera: Psychodidae) toBacillus sphaericus

Abstract: Laboratory experiments were conducted to measure the susceptibility of larvae of the sandflyPhlebotomus papatasiScopoli to the insect pathogenBacillus sphaericusapplied to the larval breeding medium.B. sphaericushad no effect on larvae aged 30 ± 2 days old, but larvae aged 13 ± 2 and 20 ± 2 days were highly susceptible and a clear dose response effect was detected. WhenB. sphaericuswas left in the rearing medium for 18 days there was a significant increase in larval mortality, indicating persistence and possib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It may also vary with different conditions such as temperature, nutrition and larval stage. For example, in our results B. sphaericus showed slight pathogenicity to L. longipalpis larvae, but under different conditions, Pener and Wilamowski (1996) observed high susceptibility of 13 + 2 and 20 + 2 days old larvae of P. papatasi to B. sphaericus.…”
Section: Larvaecontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may also vary with different conditions such as temperature, nutrition and larval stage. For example, in our results B. sphaericus showed slight pathogenicity to L. longipalpis larvae, but under different conditions, Pener and Wilamowski (1996) observed high susceptibility of 13 + 2 and 20 + 2 days old larvae of P. papatasi to B. sphaericus.…”
Section: Larvaecontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…The susceptibility of sandfly larvae to Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis was previously demonstrated by Barjac et al (1981) against Lutzomyia longipalpis and Phlebotomus papatasi. Pener & Wilamowski (1996) showed that P. papatasi is susceptible to B. sphaericus. Such studies do not clarify the pathogenicity of Bacillus to sandfly larvae and no study has compared toxicity of entomopathogenic Bacillus species to sandfly enized with 1 g of autoclaved larval food, and used during seven days in each experimental lot.…”
Section: Larvaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were problems with the high cost of the product and its high viscosity, which made it difficult to spray. More encouragingly, selective application of the biopesticide Bacillus sphaericus ( Bs ) into the burrows of host rodents was successful against P. papatasi (Pener et al ., 1996). The Bs toxin works as a stomach poison against target insects, but it remains unclear whether the impact was mostly on immature or adult sandflies.…”
Section: Controlling the Immature Stages Of Phlebotomine Sandfliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxicity of L. sphaericus strains to a wide range of mosquito species and to a Phlebotomus patatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) has been reported [182,183] but, since individual toxins were not assessed, the contribution of particular proteins to this activity is unclear.…”
Section: Toxins From Lysinibacillus Sphaericusmentioning
confidence: 99%