2015
DOI: 10.1080/09670874.2015.1016472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of larvae and adults ofMonochamus galloprovincialisto entomopathogenic fungi under controlled conditions

Abstract: Six entomopathogenic fungal isolates were tested under controlled conditions, as biological control agents against Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) (Olivier), the vector of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae) (Steiner and Buhrer). The fungi Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill, Metarhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) Sorokin, Metarhizium sp. and Fusarium sp. were tested against larvae and adults of the insect, by comparing two exposure techni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of insect vector control, several strategies have been developed to reduce M. galloprovincialis populations such as a trapping method combining pheromone and kairomones (Álvarez-Baz et al, 2016; Galloprotect 2D R ), the use of entomopathogenic fungi (Naves et al, 2008;Álvarez-Baz et al, 2015;Petersen-Silva et al, 2015) and the development of an auto-infection device based on the combined use of the attractant and the entomopathogenic fungi (Sacristán-Velasco et al, 2018). To date, only the use of traps with attractants has been implemented more widely, but successful field trials have been performed combining this system with the auto-infection device and powdered formulations of an entomopathogenic fungus (Martín-García, Unpublished data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of insect vector control, several strategies have been developed to reduce M. galloprovincialis populations such as a trapping method combining pheromone and kairomones (Álvarez-Baz et al, 2016; Galloprotect 2D R ), the use of entomopathogenic fungi (Naves et al, 2008;Álvarez-Baz et al, 2015;Petersen-Silva et al, 2015) and the development of an auto-infection device based on the combined use of the attractant and the entomopathogenic fungi (Sacristán-Velasco et al, 2018). To date, only the use of traps with attractants has been implemented more widely, but successful field trials have been performed combining this system with the auto-infection device and powdered formulations of an entomopathogenic fungus (Martín-García, Unpublished data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little attention has been paid to potential nematicidal effects of the genus Beauveria spp. on PWN, despite significant mortality effect on other nematodes species being thoroughly documented (Youssef et al, 2020;Ye et al, 2021;Karabörklü et al, 2022) and its entomopathogenic effect on M. galloprovincialis is well known (Naves et al, 2008;Álvarez-Baz et al, 2015;Petersen-Silva et al, 2015). Maehara et al (2007) proved the reduction of PWN transmission from vectors due to Beauveria bassiana was possible; however, this potential control method has not been examined in depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%