2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of existing and planned Chinese railway system subjected to rainfall-induced multi-hazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning methods are also available for multi-hazard risk assessment. In Reference [45], risk analysis for each natural hazard type was carried out by modifying the weights of each parameter according to the hazard type using the random forest (RF) method. Afterward, a multi-hazard map was produced by combining the results.…”
Section: Background On Multi-hazard Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning methods are also available for multi-hazard risk assessment. In Reference [45], risk analysis for each natural hazard type was carried out by modifying the weights of each parameter according to the hazard type using the random forest (RF) method. Afterward, a multi-hazard map was produced by combining the results.…”
Section: Background On Multi-hazard Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the research articles, documents with quantitative analysis prevail with 57%. (Wipulanusat, Nakrod, & Prabnarong, 2009), (Mahendra, Prakash, Srinivasa Kumar, Shenoi, & Shailesh, 2010), (Lozoya, Sardá, & Jiménez, 2011), (Kappes, Keiler, von Elverfeldt, & Glade, 2012), (Kappes, Gruber, et al, 2012), (Marzocchi, Garcia-Aristizabal, Gasparini, Mastellone, & Ruocco, 2012), (Kameshwar & Padgett, 2014), (Johnson, Depietri, & Breil, 2016), (Gill & Malamud, 2017), (Stults, 2017), (Villegas-González, Ramos-Cañón, González-Méndez, González-Salazar, & De Plaza-Solórzano, 2017), (Bonacho & Oliveira, 2018), (Furlan, Torresan, Critto, & Marcomini, 2018), (Hagenlocher, Renaud, Haas, & Sebesvari, 2018), (Hernández, Carreño, & Castillo, 2018), (Kwag & Hahm, 2018), (K. Liu, Wang, Cao, Zhu, & Yang, 2018), (Mukherjee, Nateghi, & Hastak, 2018), (Pilone & Demichela, 2018), (Reniers, Khakzad, Cozzani, & Khan, 2018), (Sahoo & Bhaskaran, 2018), (Viavattene et al, 2018), (Zimmaro, Stewart, Brandenberg, Kwak, & Jongejan, 2018) As mentioned above, at the level of research articles, quantitative analyses predominate, and this is a trend that is repeated under the type of analysis level (see Figure 10). Descriptive analyses represent 23% of the 30 analyzed documents, and the other ones contain qualitative, semi-quantitative, and mixed analysis approaches (e.g., combining qualitative, semiquantitative and quantitative analyses).…”
Section: Analysis Of Publications Based On Multi-hazard Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the collapse of slopes, the geohazard in region IV.A also resulted in ground collapse caused by unreasonable drainage facilities. In these regions, slope protection and reasonable drainage facilities should be strengthened in highway construction (Chang et al 2011;Liu et al 2018). 4.…”
Section: Geohazards Regionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%