2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of different populations of ticks to entomopathogenic fungi

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effect of the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae sensu lato (s.l.) and Beauveria bassiana sensu lato (s.l.) on two distinct populations of Rhipicephalus microplus, from two different experimental farms. Bioassays were performed with engorged females, eggs and larvae. Fungal infection was evaluated based on biological parameters of treated engorged females, percentage of hatch from treated eggs, and percentage of mortality and mean lethal time (LT90) of treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluorescence microscopy was not possible for conducting experiment 3 because Calcofluor White did not stain conidia covered with oil. Also, differences in conidial germination may occur in ticks from different populations, since ticks from different populations may have different susceptibilities to fungal infection (Fernandes et al, 2011;Perinotto et al, 2012). In the current study, experiments 2 and 3 were conducted on different occasions with ticks from different locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fluorescence microscopy was not possible for conducting experiment 3 because Calcofluor White did not stain conidia covered with oil. Also, differences in conidial germination may occur in ticks from different populations, since ticks from different populations may have different susceptibilities to fungal infection (Fernandes et al, 2011;Perinotto et al, 2012). In the current study, experiments 2 and 3 were conducted on different occasions with ticks from different locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Irigaray et al 2003;Klingen and Westrum 2007;Shi et al 2005). However, these studies were conducted using a single host population and potential intraspecific variations in spider mites susceptibility have, to our knowledge, never been investigated within a single experiment (but see, for instance, Afifi et al 2010;Fiedler and Sosnowska 2007;Ribeiro et al 2009 for a comparison among spider mites and/or among other arthropod species; or Milner 1982;1985;Perinotto et al 2012;Uma Devi et al 2008 for intraspecific variation within other arthropod species).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is hoped that EF isolated from cattle farms will be effective against tick populations that are either susceptible or multi‐resistant to chemical acaricides. Perinotto et al () observed not only that different populations of ticks can have different levels of susceptibility to biological control using EF and that the genotypic characteristics of the tick are important factors, but also, by contrast, that when a tick population is resistant to chemical acaricides, it is inappropriate to neglect the possible interference of the tick resistance mechanism in the performance of EF. Thus, the objectives of the present study were: (a) to evaluate the acaricidal effects of 55 strains of M. anisopliae isolated from tropical cattle farms in engorged females from two populations of R. microplus , of which one was multi‐resistant and one susceptible to chemical acaricides, and (b) to determine the lethal concentrations required to kill 50% (LC 50 ) and 99% (LC 99 ) of engorged ticks using fungal strains with high acaricidal effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%