Susceptibility of Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium gallinaceum: A Trait of the Mosquito, the Parasite, and the Environment

Abstract

BackgroundVector susceptibility to Plasmodium infection is treated primarily as a vector trait, although it is a composite trait expressing the joint occurrence of the parasite and the vector with genetic contributions of both. A comprehensive approach to assess the specific contribution of genetic and environmental variation on “vector susceptibility” is lacking. Here we developed and implemented a simple scheme to assess the specific contributions of the vector, the parasite, and the environment to “vector susceptibility.” To the best of our knowledge this is the first study that employs such an approach.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe conducted selection experiments on the vector (while holding the parasite “constant”) and on the parasite (while holding the vector “constant”) to estimate the genetic contributions of the mosquito and the parasite to the susceptibility of Anopheles stephensi to Plasmodium gallinaceum. We separately estimated the realized heritability of (i) susceptibility to parasite infection by the mosquito vector and (ii) parasite compatibility (transmissibility) with the vector while controlling the other. The heritabilities of vector and the parasite were higher for the prevalence, i.e., fraction of infected mosquitoes, than the corresponding heritabilities of parasite load, i.e., the number of oocysts per mosquito.ConclusionsThe vector's genetics (heritability) comprised 67% of “vector susceptibility” measured by the prevalence of mosquitoes infected with P. gallinaceum oocysts, whereas the specific contribution of parasite genetics (heritability) to this trait was only 5%. Our parasite source might possess minimal genetic diversity, which could explain its low heritability (and the high value of the vector). Notably, the environment contributed 28%. These estimates are relevant only to the particular system under study, but this experimental design could be useful for other parasite-host systems. The prospects and limitations of the genetic manipulation of vector populations to render the vector resistant to the parasite are better considered on the basis of this framework.

Diet-Induced Nutritional Stress and Pathogen Interference in Wolbachia-Infected Aedes aegypti

“…Infection with P . gallinaceum is typically subject to high variability, with great differences in prevalence and pathogen levels resulting from mosquito, parasite and avian genetic factors, and environmental factors [33, 63, 64]. Each experiment involved different chickens, with different genetic and immune responses that could have influenced the course of infection [65].…”

Mosquito Vectors and the Globalization of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria

“…(65). It has even been possible to select for strains of P. gallinaceum, a parasite normally transmitted by Culex spp., that can be transmitted by an anopheline mosquito (36). Selection of arboviruses by the mosquito innate immune defense has also been demonstrated (9).…”

Evolutionary potential of the extrinsic incubation period of dengue virus inAedes aegypti

“…; Hume et al. ) that in part has resulted from a history of local adaptation with pathogens (Joy et al. ; Lambrechts et al.…”