2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.220501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility at the superfluid-insulator transition for one-dimensional disordered bosons

Abstract: A pair of recent Monte Carlo studies have reported evidence for and against a crossover from weak-to strongdisorder criticality in the one-dimensional dirty boson problem. The Monte Carlo analyses rely on measurement of two observables: the effective Luttinger parameter K eff and the superfluid susceptibility χ . The former quantity was previously calculated analytically, using the strong-disorder renormalization group (SDRG), by Altman, Kafri, Polkovnikov, and Refael. Here, we use an extension of the SDRG fra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SDRG treatment of this model is described in Refs. [8,[77][78][79][80][81] and has been recently reviewed in [82].…”
Section: Superfluid-insulator Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SDRG treatment of this model is described in Refs. [8,[77][78][79][80][81] and has been recently reviewed in [82].…”
Section: Superfluid-insulator Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for this discrepancy could be that all these Strong Disorder RG numerical results are based on the approximation of the 'maximum rule' introduced in the very first paper concerning d > 1 [5], that allows to study much bigger sizes. This 'maximum rule' approximation has been recently questionned [33] for another quantum model, namely the superfluid transition for random bosons (see the discussions in section III B and Appendix A of [33]). For our present model, we believe that the use of the approximated 'maximum rules' instead of the full 'sum rules' could be a problem for the following reasons : (i) the full 'sum rule' corresponds for the Directed Polymer model to the computation of the partition function as a sum over all paths, so that what shows up is the fluctuation exponent ω DP < 1/2 of the free-energy, that we have discussed in detail in the present paper.…”
Section: B Power-law Distribution Of the Local Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining possibility could be to develop other types of approximation, like the cut-off approximation introduced recently in [33].…”
Section: B Power-law Distribution Of the Local Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of renormalization to longer scales, the effective distribution of weak links flows toward a universal structure, which determines the universal behavior at the critical point. The value of the Luttinger parameter at the transition is, however, non-universal and depends on where the phase boundary is crossed [16][17][18][19] (i.e. on the strength of the bare disorder and interactions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%