2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4887-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survivorship of the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy: What Factors are Associated with Long-term Failure?

Abstract: Background The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) continues to be a commonly performed nonarthroplasty option to treat symptomatic developmental hip dysplasia, but there are few long-term followup studies evaluating results after PAO. Questions/purposes (1) What is the long-term survivorship of the hip after PAO? (2) What were the validated outcomes scores among patients who had PAO more than 14 years ago? (3) What factors are associated with longterm failure? Methods One hundred fifty-eight dysplastic hip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
108
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
108
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitations of the distribution-based approach (i.e., strong influence of the population characteristics and possible insensitivity to true differences in patient perception) dictate that future studies also use the anchoring approach. At the same time, the minimal clinically important differences calculated in this study were also smaller than the mean differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic hips at a minimum of 14 years of follow-up in another study 33 . Therefore, the calculated minimal clinically important differences seem to represent a true minimal difference that can be observed after periacetabular osteotomy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The limitations of the distribution-based approach (i.e., strong influence of the population characteristics and possible insensitivity to true differences in patient perception) dictate that future studies also use the anchoring approach. At the same time, the minimal clinically important differences calculated in this study were also smaller than the mean differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic hips at a minimum of 14 years of follow-up in another study 33 . Therefore, the calculated minimal clinically important differences seem to represent a true minimal difference that can be observed after periacetabular osteotomy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…However, PAO can result in unsatisfactory outcomes [25]. There are several potential factors that can lead to undesirable outcomes of PAO in patients with DDH [5,25,26]. Acetabular cartilage insufficiency of varying extents appears to be a major cause [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of FAI syndrome was based on evidence of restricted range of motion and anterior impingement test in patients with radiographic evidence of alpha angle greater than 55 or lateral center edge angle greater than 38 [1,11,[20][21][22]. Patients that presented with hip pain and radiographic evidence of femoral head uncovering and a lateral center-edge angle less than 20 degrees were diagnosed with symptomatic AD [23][24][25][26][27][28]. Patients with concurrent diagnoses, such as hip osteoarthritis or previous hip surgeries, were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%