“…70 With an overburdened oncology workforce and the rapid growth of the aging population with complex care needs, there is a critical need to develop risk-stratified survivorship care that is aligned to the needs of individual patients and, in the case of older adults, that should consider life expectancy, functional status, comorbidities, and polypharmacy. 71 Geriatric assessments provide a comprehensive understanding of physical function, cognition, nutrition, comorbid conditions, psychological status, and social support. 5 Guidelines recommend geriatric assessments for all patients aged 65 years and older diagnosed with cancer who are starting chemotherapy.…”
Section: Quality and Coordination Of Care For Older Patients With Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only one‐third of community oncology practices report having access to a geriatrician for consult, and only 5% have access within the oncology clinic 73 . Future research needs to comprehensively assess the functioning of older adults with cancer, identify their supportive care and social support needs, assess their capability for managing and accessing care, and characterize the involvement and needs of caregivers to facilitate the delivery of high‐quality survivorship care to older adults with cancer 71 …”
Section: Priority Research Areas In Cancer and Agingmentioning
BACKGROUND:The global population of older cancer survivors is growing. However, the intersections of aging-related health risks across the cancer control continuum are poorly understood, limiting the integration of aging into cancer control research and practice. The objective of this study was to review the state of science and provide future directions to improve the quality of evidence in 6 priority research areas in cancer and aging. METHODS: The authors identified priority research areas in cancer and aging through an evidencebased Research Jam process involving 32 investigators and trainees from multiple disciplines and research centers in aging and cancer; then, they conducted a narrative review of the state of the science and future directions to improve the quality of evidence in these research areas. Priority research areas were defined as those in which gaps in scientific evidence or clinical practice limit the health and well-being of older adults with cancer. RESULTS: Six priority research areas were identified: cognitive and physical functional outcomes of older cancer survivors, sampling issues in studies of older cancer survivors, risk and resilience across the lifespan, caregiver support and well-being, quality of care for older patients with cancer, and health disparities. Evidence in these areas could be improved through the incorporation of bias reduction techniques into longitudinal studies of older cancer survivors, novel data linkage, and improved representation of older adults in cancer research. CONCLUSIONS: The priority research areas and methodologies identified here may be used to guide interdisciplinary research and improve the quality of evidence on cancer and aging.
“…70 With an overburdened oncology workforce and the rapid growth of the aging population with complex care needs, there is a critical need to develop risk-stratified survivorship care that is aligned to the needs of individual patients and, in the case of older adults, that should consider life expectancy, functional status, comorbidities, and polypharmacy. 71 Geriatric assessments provide a comprehensive understanding of physical function, cognition, nutrition, comorbid conditions, psychological status, and social support. 5 Guidelines recommend geriatric assessments for all patients aged 65 years and older diagnosed with cancer who are starting chemotherapy.…”
Section: Quality and Coordination Of Care For Older Patients With Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only one‐third of community oncology practices report having access to a geriatrician for consult, and only 5% have access within the oncology clinic 73 . Future research needs to comprehensively assess the functioning of older adults with cancer, identify their supportive care and social support needs, assess their capability for managing and accessing care, and characterize the involvement and needs of caregivers to facilitate the delivery of high‐quality survivorship care to older adults with cancer 71 …”
Section: Priority Research Areas In Cancer and Agingmentioning
BACKGROUND:The global population of older cancer survivors is growing. However, the intersections of aging-related health risks across the cancer control continuum are poorly understood, limiting the integration of aging into cancer control research and practice. The objective of this study was to review the state of science and provide future directions to improve the quality of evidence in 6 priority research areas in cancer and aging. METHODS: The authors identified priority research areas in cancer and aging through an evidencebased Research Jam process involving 32 investigators and trainees from multiple disciplines and research centers in aging and cancer; then, they conducted a narrative review of the state of the science and future directions to improve the quality of evidence in these research areas. Priority research areas were defined as those in which gaps in scientific evidence or clinical practice limit the health and well-being of older adults with cancer. RESULTS: Six priority research areas were identified: cognitive and physical functional outcomes of older cancer survivors, sampling issues in studies of older cancer survivors, risk and resilience across the lifespan, caregiver support and well-being, quality of care for older patients with cancer, and health disparities. Evidence in these areas could be improved through the incorporation of bias reduction techniques into longitudinal studies of older cancer survivors, novel data linkage, and improved representation of older adults in cancer research. CONCLUSIONS: The priority research areas and methodologies identified here may be used to guide interdisciplinary research and improve the quality of evidence on cancer and aging.
“…As a result of changes in how cancer care is delivered, certain care needs of older cancer survivors have emerged. [5] Caregivers (i.e., informal/unpaid people who provide care to a friend or family member) of older adults with cancer are increasingly relied upon for complex, intense, and ongoing care, which has contributed to increased caregivingrelated burden. [6] Caregivers help with tasks across the cancer care continuum, which can include long-term management of cancer treatment side effects, symptoms, and adherence; logistical support coordinating services, care, and transportation; clinical treatment decision-making [7] and daily life support through assisting with mobility, nutrition, and hygiene.…”
Purpose of ReviewThe number of older adults with cancer relying on support from caregivers continues to increase. Health disparities in older adults with cancer often extend to their caregivers. This review aims to assess the state of cancer caregiving research in historically underrepresented diverse populations and provide recommendations for future research and policy. Recent Findings Research on caregivers of older adults with cancer from diverse backgrounds has primarily been descriptive. Health disparities for historically underrepresented caregivers (LGBTQ + , BIPOC, rural, young adults, youth) exist across several dimensions (e.g., financial, mental, and physical health, and access to caregiver support). Few published studies have closely examined the unique experiences of these caregivers nor provided culturally appropriate tailored interventions. Summary Health equity research within caregiving populations is in its infancy. Priorities for future work should focus on identifying modifiable targets for intervention, changing systems-level processes in acknowledging and supporting caregivers, and creating policies that reduce financial inequities of caregiving.
“…Multidisciplinary care can play an important role in the management of older cancer survivors. Multidisciplinary care is an innovative model of care coordination that aims to shift the burden of short- and long-term survivorship care delivery from the oncologist to a multidisciplinary care team [ 3 ]. It leverages the concurrent input of more than one care healthcare discipline (e.g., physicians, nurses, rehabilitation professionals, social work, and other supportive care services) in the delivery of treatment and care planning [ 4 ].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.