The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survivin is not a promising serological maker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract: Abstract. Survivin expression in the serum of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and nonmalignant chronic liver diseases remain to be elucidated. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the diagnostic role of survivin in the serum of patients with HCC and identify which ELISA kit performed best in detecting the levels of serum survivin. In total, 80 patients were included in the present study, including 20 patients with HCC, 20 patients with liver cirrhosis, 20 patients with chronic hepatitis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The levels of serum survivin were not found to be significantly higher in patients with HCC and chronic HBV, compared with the control group. No significant differences in survivin levels were observed between the patients with liver cirrhosis and the healthy controls [12]. The findings of the presented study were similar -the level of survivin did not differ in the group with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, compared to the control group, which confirmed the thesis that the level of survivin is not a good marker of liver cirrhosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The levels of serum survivin were not found to be significantly higher in patients with HCC and chronic HBV, compared with the control group. No significant differences in survivin levels were observed between the patients with liver cirrhosis and the healthy controls [12]. The findings of the presented study were similar -the level of survivin did not differ in the group with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, compared to the control group, which confirmed the thesis that the level of survivin is not a good marker of liver cirrhosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As a commercially available kit was used, we did not validate the results with other methods, which represents a limitation of our study. Previous studies show that different commercially available kits may have different sensitivity; however, in their setting, no difference was observed between cancer patients and controls in regard to the levels of serum survivin detected by two different ELISA kits [ 47 ]. Before potential implementation in the clinical practice, further studies should therefore validate which commercially available assays are the most sensitive and reliable in the detection of a serum pool of survivin in MM patients and have higher predictive values in serum samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U različitim istraživanjima, medijana vrednosti survivina je pokazala veoma različite vrednosti. U slučaju "non-small cell" tumoru pluća je bila 81,92 pg/ml 43 , u slučaju tumora mokraćne bešike 17,7 pg/ml 51 , kod pacijenata u trenutku dijagnostikovanja malignog mezotelioma 4,1 pg/ml, nakon hemoterapije obolelih od malignog mezotelioma 73,1 pg/ml 50 , u slučaju maligne efuzije pleure 844,17 pg/ ml 52 , u slučaju prolaktinoma 19,04 pg/ml 53 i u slučaju hepatocelularnog karcinoma 0 pg/ml 54 .…”
Section: Diskusijaunclassified