Survival Rates of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Restored with All-Ceramic Partial-Coverage Crowns: When Systematic Review Fails

Abstract

Background: To determine the survival rates of endodontically treated posterior teeth (EDPT) restored with partial coverage all-ceramic crowns with or without the use of fiber posts. Methods: MEDLINE and Cochrane searches were conducted in order to identify Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) related to endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with partial coverage crowns. The search period was extended until February 2020 and only in vivo, human, and studies in the English language were included. A manual search was also conducted and additional articles, if found, were included in the database. Results: The initial search for the selected databases identified 495 studies, which were all screened for inclusion through titles, abstracts and full-text reading. Out of these 495 studies, only one article met the eligibility criteria and was included in this systematic review. Statistical analysis could not be performed. Conclusions: Only one RCT was identified in this systematic review. More clinical evidence is necessary to assess the survival rate of EDPT with partial-coverage crowns. This systematic review failed because it did not find scientific evidence to support the use of indirect bonded restorations on EDPT.

Maxillary anterior teeth with extensive root resorption treated with multidisciplinary approach: A case report

“…In relation to the restoration of the tooth, the post space was too wide for using a single prefabricated post, glass fiber-reinforced post was used embedded in resin composite to diminish the amount of resin cement necessary. This issue is important because thick cement lines may negatively influence the bond strength of post cemented to the root dentin [19][20][21][22]. The use of fiberreinforced dowels associated with adhesive dentistry has increased the rate of success of such cases [19].…”