2018
DOI: 10.1002/wsb.893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival rates and harvest patterns of Ohio‐Banded Canada geese

Abstract: Growth of temperate breeding Canada goose (Branta canadensis maxima) populations remains a challenge for agencies that seek to balance social acceptance with demand for hunting opportunity from constituents. Harvest regulation is the principle means by which federal and state agencies attempt to keep populations in balance with their environment. Band recovery data and aerial surveys are used to monitor populations and evaluate population control efforts. Greater than 140,000 temperate‐breeding Canada geese we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the number of possible candidate models and because we expected survival and dead recovery rates to be affected similarly by the factors in our analysis, we kept the same structure for the survival and dead recovery parameters in each model. We reduced the candidate model set to 16 models after preliminary analyses revealed models with time interaction effects were strongly favored over all other models (Shirkey et al 2018). This prevented us from examining models with other time‐dependent variables of interest (White and Burnham 1999) and resulted in issues with ranking models using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC; Burnham and Anderson 2002) because the time variable explained most of the variation in the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To reduce the number of possible candidate models and because we expected survival and dead recovery rates to be affected similarly by the factors in our analysis, we kept the same structure for the survival and dead recovery parameters in each model. We reduced the candidate model set to 16 models after preliminary analyses revealed models with time interaction effects were strongly favored over all other models (Shirkey et al 2018). This prevented us from examining models with other time‐dependent variables of interest (White and Burnham 1999) and resulted in issues with ranking models using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC; Burnham and Anderson 2002) because the time variable explained most of the variation in the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adapted methods described by Shirkey et al (2018) to create annual harvest regulation and winter severity indices during 1999–2019. We calculated the harvest regulation index as the annual sum of the number of days in a goose hunting season multiplied by the daily bag limit of the season; thus, larger values indicated more liberal goose hunting regulations that year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Daily bag limit and season length were time-dependent covariates with bag limit changing only once (2008) and season lengths changing three times: in 1994, 1995, and 1997 (Table 2). Because daily bag limit and season length were both time dependent, we could not include them with a fully time-varying model, so we did not include time as a covariate when estimating survival parameters (White and Burnham 1999;Heller 2010;Shirkey et. al.…”
Section: Survival Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%