Survival rate of disk and screw-type implants used for the retention of extraoral prostheses

Vitomir, Konstantinović S.; Ivanjac, Filip; Lazić, Vesna; Đorđević, Igor; Lukasz, Palka

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.023

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The site of force transmission is far away from the site of bacterial invasion, allowing for early loading and resistance to infection. In Konstantinović et al’s study, the survival rate of basal implants used for the retention of extraoral prostheses was assessed [ 8 ]. The overall 12-year survival rate of nasal basal implants (28 patients were included) was 92.9%, which is a very good result compared with screw implants.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Latest Craniofacial Reconstructive Techniques Using Anchored Implants after Surgical Treatment of Nasal and Paranasal Sinuses Tumors

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reconstructive surgery after surgical treatment of neoplasms in the head and neck region is always a challenge. Many factors are responsible for the success of reconstruction. The anatomy of the facial region is complex, which significantly influences the aesthetic effect of the reconstruction. Moreover, many patients undergo postoperative radiotherapy after surgical treatment, which affects the range of reconstructive techniques. The aim of this study is to review current reconstructive methods in the craniofacial region, using bone-anchored implants to attach nasal prostheses. The article also comprises the authors’ own experience with successful single-stage, Vistafix 3 osseointegrated implants for the attachment of an external nasal prosthesis in a 51-year-old man after surgical removal of squamous cell carcinoma of the nose and paranasal sinuses. The literature search for articles regarding implants in craniofacial reconstructions was performed using the three following databases: Scopus, Web of Science and MEDLINE (through PubMed), and follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (PRISMA). A systematic literature search was set for 2018–2023 and retrieved 92 studies. From them, 18 articles were included in the review.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Latest Craniofacial Reconstructive Techniques Using Anchored Implants after Surgical Treatment of Nasal and Paranasal Sinuses Tumors

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…25 Vitomir et al found the overall nasal implant survival rate in adults of 28 implants monitored over 12 years in the nasal region to be 93.3%. 42 The placement of dental implants is usually restricted to patients with completed craniofacial growth. Risks associated with placing implants in children, as discussed by Lekholm,22 points out that implants act like an ankylotic tooth and will not move together with growing surrounding structures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With the unit of measure being visit/sites for a total of 76 visit/sites, Nishimura et al found 85.5% (65/76) of visit/sites showed an absence of inflammation, 10.5% (8/76) of visit/sites demonstrated slight redness, and one visit/site demonstrated red and moist tissue 25 . Vitomir et al found the overall nasal implant survival rate in adults of 28 implants monitored over 12 years in the nasal region to be 93.3% 42 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

9‐Year Follow‐Up on Maxillofacial Implant‐Supported Framework Designed to Accommodate Childhood Growth

Balshi

Wolfinger

Pellecchia

et al. 2022

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This clinical report focuses on the challenges and solutions for a child subjected to craniofacial trauma from a wild hyena biting off his nose and anterior maxilla. Unique considerations in prosthodontics and biomedical engineering were required based on future craniofacial growth and development of the child. The physical requirement of a maximum retentive prosthesis for an active, athletic child required unique engineering designs and executions. The sequence of treatment and prosthesis fabrication are detailed. The patient has been followed for 9 years without physiologic complications and only minor prosthodontic complications.

show abstract

“…It is worth highlighting that while using disc drills the temperature decreased in proportion to the increasing drilling speed, which, so far, has not been described in the literature. This may have some clinical implications as disk implants are used in cranio-facial surgery for epithesis anchorage in auricular and orbital regions [31,32]. Since in these regions there is a close vicinity of anatomical structures and the bone often undergoes irradiation, high temperature during bed preparation may be undesirable.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study

Ihde

Dalewski

Pałka³

2021

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this experimental study was to verify thermal diffusion differences, by measuring the maximum temperature achieved with different drill shapes. Synthetic bone blocks of type I density made from solid rigid polyurethane (PUR) foam were used to perform the drilling procedures. The experiment was conducted at three different rotation speeds: 800, 3000 and 5000 rpm. Conical drills (with and without an internal cooling hole) were compared with horizontal drills and disc drills. The temperature during drilling for implant bed preparation was estimated with the use of thermocouples and an infrared (IR) camera. The temperature during drilling with disc cutters for lateral basal implants did not exceed 33 ∘C and the temperature decreased in proportion to higher drill speed. The results indicate that the tested design is safe and will not cause bone overheating.

show abstract

Survival rate of disk and screw-type implants used for the retention of extraoral prostheses

Cited by 5 publications

References 19 publications

The Latest Craniofacial Reconstructive Techniques Using Anchored Implants after Surgical Treatment of Nasal and Paranasal Sinuses Tumors

The Latest Craniofacial Reconstructive Techniques Using Anchored Implants after Surgical Treatment of Nasal and Paranasal Sinuses Tumors

9‐Year Follow‐Up on Maxillofacial Implant‐Supported Framework Designed to Accommodate Childhood Growth

The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About