2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.65.024308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival probability of superheavy nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8) for the single chance fission 1n reaction seems better. Apart from the calculation by Zubov et al [34] using masses due to Smolanczuk [35], there is fair agreement between the deduced and predicted values of W sur , especially considering the possibility of a systematic underestimate (of a factor of 2.7) of W sur in this work due to uncertainties in σ EVR . Of greater concern are the deviations between the predicted and deduced values of the survival probabilities for the multiple chance fission reactions, which are intrinsically harder to predict.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…8) for the single chance fission 1n reaction seems better. Apart from the calculation by Zubov et al [34] using masses due to Smolanczuk [35], there is fair agreement between the deduced and predicted values of W sur , especially considering the possibility of a systematic underestimate (of a factor of 2.7) of W sur in this work due to uncertainties in σ EVR . Of greater concern are the deviations between the predicted and deduced values of the survival probabilities for the multiple chance fission reactions, which are intrinsically harder to predict.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In Refs. [11][12][13][14] we have already calculated evaporation residue cross sections and excitation functions for superheavy isotopes using their properties, predicted by different theoretical models [15][16][17][18]. The results are in a good agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The formation of a superheavy compound nucleus and its subsequent deexcitation by particle emission resulting in an evaporation residue of the superheavy nucleus depends on a number of factors [1][2][3][4][5]. The production cross section of a superheavy nucleus as an evaporation residue (ER) can be written as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%