2017
DOI: 10.1159/000484411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival Outcome of Intermediate-Grade Salivary Gland Carcinoma

Abstract: Objective: Histological grade is the most important factor for defining treatment strategies and predicting prognosis for salivary gland carcinoma (SGC). We examined factors affecting long-term recurrence and survival among intermediate-grade SGC (IGSGC) patients to define optimal treatment modalities and outcomes. Methods: We reviewed the clinical and pathological data on 108 IGSGC patients who underwent definitive surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy. We compared treatment outcomes by treatment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, the histological grade has been identified as the most predictive factor in the prognosis for SGC . In our study, patients with major salivary gland squamous cell carcinoma are found to have a lower survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Previously, the histological grade has been identified as the most predictive factor in the prognosis for SGC . In our study, patients with major salivary gland squamous cell carcinoma are found to have a lower survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The remaining 1496 abstracts were screened for eligibility, yielding 131 manuscripts. Their full text evaluation identified 64 studies meeting the inclusion criteria 17–80 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, only 5 articles (7.8%) 35,49,50,57,70 reported a study period shorter than 10 years. The remaining 46 papers (71.9%) presented a median study period of 16 years 17–20,22–26,28–31,33,36–42,44–48,51–55,59–64,66,68,69,71–74,78,79 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty‐one studies comprising a total of 11 698 patients (5636 [48%] males) were included 3,15–66 . The mean age was 57.1 years, range 2–97 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, 13 studies reported ONM data stratified by pathologic grade (Table 2). 18,27,35,38,42,45,48,49,59,63–66 High‐grade tumors had a 3.76 increased risk of ONM than low‐intermediate grade tumors (RR 3.76, 95% CI = 2.89–4.89) (Figure 3). Low‐intermediate grade tumors had a pooled ONM rate of 8.7% (95% CI = 5.3%–12.7%); high‐grade tumors had a pooled ONM rate of 31.9% (95% CI = 19.4%–45.8%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%